PubMed · 8109070
The biology, physiology, husbandry, and handling of the hedgehog are described. Diseases and conditions of practical significance are reviewed.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H L Hoefer. 1994. Hedgehogs.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-5616(94)50006-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A more-closed farming system can be a good starting point for eradication of infectious diseases from within a herd. The economic implications of a more-closed farming system will not always be obvious to farmers. The management decisions are related to different parts of the farm and are farm-specific. To support these decisions, a model was developed of the economic consequences of a more-closed system (a simple static and deterministic design was used). The risk factors in the model were based solely on bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV1) but losses due to introduction of BVDV, L. hardjo, and S. dublin were added to the model. The model was verified and partly validated and a sensitivity analysis was done. The cost to one 55-cow dairy farm that refrained from purchasing cattle, provided protective clothing to professional visitors and a temporary employee, and built and maintained a double fence around 6 ha of land to prevent over-the-fence contacts was Dfl. 4495 over 5 years. The probability of disease introduction was decreased by 74%. The prevented losses for disease introduction amounted to Dfl. 7033 over 5 years (net benefits of Dfl. 2538 over 5 years).A more-closed system would be still beneficial when a sanitary barrier was used instead of just protective clothing, when the probability of introduction of infectious diseases was decreased, and when odds ratios in the model were replaced by more-conservative relative risks. The benefits became negative when a farm had to build and maintain a double fence around 12 ha instead of 6 ha, when the probability of introduction of all diseases was decreased by 50%, and when the estimations were based solely on BHV1.
Scrapie first was detected in indigenous sheep in Norway in 1981, and from 1995 to 1997 an increase in the number of flocks with scrapie cases was recorded. These flocks were mainly in one geographical region. A study to identify risk factors for scrapie was conducted. The study had three frequency-matched controls selected for every case within the same Veterinary District. A questionnaire was submitted to 176 sheep flocks (42 had been scrapie flocks). The data obtained by the questionnaire were linked to data collected from governmental and industry registers. After imputing missing data using single random imputation, the statistical analysis was performed using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Purchase of female sheep from scrapie flocks, sharing of rams, or sharing of pastures between different flocks were the risk factors associated with the occurrence of scrapie. Of factors potentially sustaining and promoting the infection in the flock, number of winter-fed sheep, number of buildings for housing sheep, rams and ewes shared room during mating period and increase in the flock size were associated with scrapie. We interpret these findings to show that factors involving transfer of sheep between flocks or direct contact between sheep of different flocks are important for the spread of scrapie. Management factors are important for the development of scrapie. However, it was not possible to discriminate between the different management factors in this study at the flock level. Also, factors indicating awareness and interest of the farmer (as well as willingness to contact a veterinarian for diseased sheep) were related to the detection of scrapie in the flock.
Knowledge of the relationship between dairy herd management and milking practices with the occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes on dairy farms might assist in the development of intervention strategies aimed at eliminating this organism at the pre-harvest dairy-food-production level. This paper represents a first step towards that goal. We carried out a cross-sectional study to identify farm factors that were associated with isolation of L. monocytogenes from on-farm in-line milk-filters. Data on these factors were collected by personal interview of the farm owners or managers. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the significance of association of each factor while simultaneously controlling for the presence of other factors. A systematic approach was developed in which the bivariable association of the hypothesized factors initially was evaluated. All significant factors were then jointly evaluated in a multivariable logistic model. Farms that used a bucket system had significantly higher odds of L. monocytogenes as compared to farms that used a round-the-barn pipeline milking system (OR=0.35,P=0.05) or milking parlor (OR=0.21,P=0.01). There was a significant association between pre-milking teat disinfection (OR=0.26,P=0.001) and pre-milking examination of abnormal appearance of milk (OR=0.4,P=0.01) against the occurrence of L. monocytogenes. We also found a significant association between the use of E. coli J5 vaccine (OR=3.3,P=0.03) and how long dry-cow therapy had been used on farm (OR=0.34,P=0.04).