PubMed · 8120727
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L Finberg. 1994. Harold E. Harrison.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70383-3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Addressing health inequity is now recognized as a clinical competency in medical education. We examined the career and writings of Robert Wilson Jr. (1867-1946), longtime dean of the Medical College of the State of South Carolina during the Jim Crow Era, using primary and secondary sources within the context of systemic and structural racism, particularly in South Carolina. Wilson used public health data to refute the "Black Extinction Hypothesis" rooted in social Darwinism. He challenged assumptions of inherent Black susceptibility to tuberculosis, linking disease instead to social determinants of health. He also identified disproportionate mortality from kidney and cardiovascular disease among Black populations, anticipating modern health disparities research. Wilson further acknowledged systemic injustice and implicated structural conditions, including housing, in shaping outcomes. In an era of continuing health inequity and racial health disparities, Wilson applied empirical evidence to reject biological determinism, identify outcomes disparities, and advocate for racial justice.
A personal narrative of my time in the Hunt laboratory and beyond is provided. The impact of the Hunt laboratory on the analysis of peptides and proteins by tandem mass spectrometry is described in the context of the time.
The increasing emphasis in medicine on treating the whole patient has focused attention of the association between emotions and disease. However, physicians have long studied the connection between mind and body. One particularly interesting researcher in this area was Thomas Holmes, a charismatic and iconoclastic Seattle physician who studied the association between stress and tuberculosis in the 1950s. Although lacking the sophistication of modern biostatistics, several of Holmes' studies suggested that persons who had experienced stressful situations, such as divorce, death of a spouse, or loss of a job, were more likely to develop tuberculosis and less likely to recover from it. Holmes consciously used the same scientific methods as his peers, devising a numeric scale that quantified stressful events and doing prospective studies with control groups. Yet, he also emphasized the need to understand each patient's story and to view his or her tuberculosis as the culmination of a life of emotional hardship. Although Holmes' work was rudimentary, his basic supposition may have been correct. Recent research, benefiting from advances in both immunology and biostatistics, suggests that stress may lead to decreased immune function and thus to clinical disease. As studies of stress and disease become more statistically sophisticated, it will be important to retain Holmes' emphasis on understanding the lives of individual patients.