PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8133513

Nucleic acid structure analysis. Mathematics for local Cartesian and helical structure parameters that are truly comparable between structures.

Abstract

Analyzing nucleic acid structures in a comparable manner has become increasingly important as the number of solved structures has increased. This paper presents the concepts, mathematics, theorems, and proofs that form the basis of a new program to analyze three-dimensional DNA and RNA structures. The approach taken here provides numerical data in accordance with guidelines set at a 1988 EMBO workshop. Mathematical definitions are provided for all local structural parameters described in the guidelines. The definitions satisfy the guideline requirements while preserving the original physical intuition of the parameters. In particular, the rotational parameters are true rotations based on a simple physical model (net rotation at constant angular velocity), not Euler angles or angles between vectors and planes as is the case with other approaches. As a result, the mathematical definitions are symmetrical with the property that a 5 degrees tilt is the same as a 5 degrees roll and a 5 degrees twist, except that the rotations take place about different axes. In other approaches, a 5 degrees tilt can mean a different amount of net rotation than a 5 degrees roll or a 5 degrees twist. A second unique feature of the mathematics is that it explicitly incorporates the concept of a pivot point, which is the point about which a base in a base-pair rotates as it buckles, propeller twists, and opens. Pivot points enable one to model the physical motion of bases more accurately. As a result, they greatly reduce and/or eliminate the statistical correlations between rotational and translational parameters that arise as mathematically induced artifacts in other approaches. This paper, together with the statistical analysis in the companion paper for determining the locations of the pivot points, provides everything needed to understand the output of the program as it relates to individual structures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M S Babcock, E P Pednault, W K Olson. 1994-03-18. Nucleic acid structure analysis. Mathematics for local Cartesian and helical structure parameters that are truly comparable between structures.. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.1213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗