PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8134733

Relative risk, risk difference and rate difference models for sparse stratified data: a pseudo likelihood approach.

Abstract

We consider a relative risk and a risk difference model for binomial data, and a rate difference model for Poisson (person year) data. It is assumed that the data are stratified in a large number of small strata. If each stratum has its own parameter in the model, then, due to the large number of parameters, straightforward maximum likelihood leads to inconsistent estimates of the relevant parameters. By contrast to the logistic model, conditioning on the number of events per stratum does not help in eliminating the stratum nuisance parameters. We propose a pseudo likelihood method to overcome these consistency problems. The resulting pseudo maximum likelihood estimates can easily be computed with standard statistical software. Our approach gives a more general framework for the Mantel-Haenszel type estimators proposed in the literature. In the special case of a series of 2 x 2 tables, for the risk and rate difference models, our approach yields exactly these ad hoc Mantel-Haenszel estimators, while for the relative risk model it gives a close approximation of the Mantel-Haenszel relative risk estimator. For the regression models corresponding to the association measures relative risk, risk difference and rate difference, our method provides analogues of conditional logistic regression, which were not previously available.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Stijnen, H C Van Houwelingen. 1993-12-30. Relative risk, risk difference and rate difference models for sparse stratified data: a pseudo likelihood approach.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780122406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗