PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8144104

[Methods for studying an isolated renal microvessel].

Abstract

Glomerular circulation is mainly regulated by two resistance arterioles, the afferent arteriole and the efferent arteriole. Many experimental findings show that each arteriole has a different sensitivity to various kinds of physiological stimuli and some vasoactive substances. Moreover, there is a regional heterogeneity of the glomerular microcirculation. Thus, many researchers have been challenged to develop direct studies that focus on the control of the renal microcirculation. The recent development of innovative in vivo and in vitro preparations provide the opportunity to directly study the renal microcirculation. In this article, we introduce the methods for isolation, cannulation and in vitro study of a single renal arteriole. The isolated renal microvessel technique permits direct in vitro assessment of single arteriolar responses in defined segments to vasoactive substances without the neurohumoral and parenchymal tissue environment. Intracellular ion concentration and functional change of the renal microvessel can be evaluated simultaneously using both this technique and fluorescent ion indicators. Accumulation of data that directly assesses the renal microcirculation may clarify mechanisms for the regulation of renal hemodynamics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Tamaki, Y Abe. 1994. [Methods for studying an isolated renal microvessel].. https://doi.org/10.1254/fpj.103.83

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Objective assessment comparing hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although several reports have subjectively highlighted the benefits of hand-assisted as compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, there has been little objective analysis comparing these two techniques. METHODS: For this study, 12 trained laparoscopic surgeons completed standardized knot-tying and dissection tasks in a laparoscopic trainer using both hand-assisted (HandPort) and traditional laparoscopic techniques. Motion analysis with the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device was used to assess performance, measuring the number of movements made, the path length of hand travel, and the time taken. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare hand-assisted (HA) and conventional laparoscopic (L) performance. A p value less than 0.05 was deemed significant. Means and standard deviations are shown in the results. RESULTS: In knot tying, for both the dominant and nondominant hands, hand-assisted rather than conventional laparoscopic techniques resulted in reduced movements (dominant: HA [114 +/- 50] vs L [321 +/- 118, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [89 +/- 36] vs L [296 +/- 96, p < 0.001]); path length (dominant: HA [1,083 +/- 680 mm] vs L [3,637 +/- 1,852 mm, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [549 +/- 339 mm] vs L [2,556 +/- 1,042 mm, p < 0.001]); and time taken (HA [162 +/- 50 s] vs L [460 +/- 179 s, p < 0.001]). However, there was no statistical difference for any measured variable with respect to the dissection task. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted surgery significantly improves the knot-tying ability among trained laparoscopic surgeons. However, there appears to be no improvement in performance for this specific dissection task.

Dissection↗

Rare variation in course and affluence of internal iliac vein due to its anatomical and surgical significance.

During regular dissection of the retroperitoneal region, three uncommon anatomical variations of the internal iliac veins were found on dissected specimens: in the first case, the internal iliac veins converge forming a common trunk draining into the left external iliac vein. In the other two cases, the internal iliac vein crosses the median plane and flows into the contralateral common iliac vein. These anomalies result from a persistence of the embryonic inferior branch of the cardinal vein and are important to be known for they may be undetected or may not appear in imaging. These data have implications for both pelvic surgeons and anatomists who manipulated this anatomical area.

Dissection↗