PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8144780

Double sequential external shocks for refractory ventricular fibrillation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A technique for terminating refractory ventricular fibrillation is described. BACKGROUND: Refractory ventricular fibrillation can occur in up to 0.1% of electrophysiologic studies. Animal studies have shown that rapid sequential shocks may reduce ventricular fibrillation threshold. METHODS: Five patients of 2,990 consecutive patients in a 3-year period experienced refractory ventricular fibrillation during 5,450 routine electrophysiologic studies. Multiple shocks were delivered by means of a single defibrillator. Double sequential shocks were delivered externally 0.5 to 4.5 s apart by means of two defibrillators with separate pairs of electrodes. RESULTS: In all patients, standard defibrillation was unsuccessful, but all were successfully resuscitated using the double sequential shocks. CONCLUSIONS: This report stresses the importance of an additional defibrillator being readily available during electrophysiologic testing. This technique of rapid, double sequential external shocks may have general applicability, providing a simple and potentially lifesaving approach to refractory ventricular fibrillation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Hoch, W P Batsford, S M Greenberg, C M McPherson, L E Rosenfeld, M Marieb, J H Levine. 1994. Double sequential external shocks for refractory ventricular fibrillation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90602-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A biventricular ICD system with biventricular defibrillation.

We describe the case of a 59-year-old gentleman with severe dilated cardiomyopathy requiring implantation of a dual-chamber biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). High defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were encountered at implant with an inadequate defibrillation safety margin. Testing of all possible shock vectors/polarities with and without the SVC coil and optimization of the distal RV coil position all proved inadequate. A satisfactory defibrillation safety margin was achieved following placement of a second lead in the coronary sinus to enable biventricular defibrillation. This case highlights an additional strategy for combating high DFTs and is an option even in dual-chamber biventricular ICD systems.

Electric Countershock↗