PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8153755

Mental first aid.

Abstract

This paper reports a survey of staff of Oslo Sporveier who had been involved in serious incidents such as accidents resulting in severe personal injuries and death, suicide, robbery and assault. The survey was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of Mental First Aid in a retrospective study. The introduction of Mental First Aid was based on the beneficial effects from early intervention reported from follow-up studies after previous disasters, so for ethical reasons there was no control group. When help was given within the first few days without the use of any external specialists, and with strong support from colleagues during the first days back at work, there was little absenteeism. The beneficial effects of early intervention are stressed as is the use of non-professionals in forming a social network around employees who have been involved in traumatic incidents. Safety ombudsmen who have been given brief instruction are brought to the site of the incident to apply the principles of Mental First Aid. These secondary preventive measures are very effective and could be implemented by other medium-sized transport companies whose staff are exposed to the risk of suicide attempts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O T Foss. 1994. Mental first aid.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90451-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common disabling disease but its economic burden has not been adequately quantified. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of migraine in the United States with respect to disability and economic costs. METHODS: The following data sources were used: published data, the Baltimore County Migraine Study, MEDSTAT's MarketScan medical claims data set, and statistics from the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Disability was expressed as bedridden days. Charges for migraine-related treatment were used as direct cost inputs. The human capital approach was used in the estimation of indirect costs. RESULTS: Migraineurs required 3.8 bed rest days for men and 5.6 days for women each year, resulting in a total of 112 million bedridden days. Migraine costs American employers about $13 billion a year because of missed workdays and impaired work function; close to $8 billion was directly due to missed workdays. Patients of both sexes aged 30 to 49 years incurred higher indirect costs compared with younger or older employed patients. Annual direct medical costs for migraine care were about $1 billion and about $100 was spent per diagnosed patient. Physician office visits accounted for about 60% of all costs; in contrast, emergency department visits contributed less than 1% of the direct costs. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of migraine predominantly falls on patients and their employers in the form of bedridden days and lost productivity. Various screening and treatment regimens should be evaluated to identify opportunities to reduce the disease burden.

Absenteeism

[Little communication between company doctors and private physicians with respect to hindrances to return to work after prolonged absence from work because of low back pain].

OBJECTIVE: To determine occurrence and reasons of contact between company doctors and treating physicians with respect to patients absent with low back pain for three months. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHOD: A cohort of employees who were absent for 3 months with back pain were selected according to defined criteria. A questionnaire about medical status and communication with treating physicians was sent to their company doctors. RESULTS: The company doctors of 300 of 467 employees participated. In 19% of the employees the company doctor contacted the curative sector (56 contacts had taken place, 14 were planned). The contact consisted almost always of exchange of information and less frequently of co-operation towards a mutual policy. In almost 50% of the cases the company doctors regarded the clinical waiting period, length of treatment and opinion of the curative sector as disincentives to return to work. Psychosocial factors such as psychological problems, work-related motivation, private problems and a conflict between employer and employee all were mentioned less frequently. Although contacts were slightly more frequent when psychosocial factors, treatment or opinion of the curative sector inhibited return to work, only disincentives such as work-related motivation, motivation to return to work and the waiting period were significantly associated with the contact frequency. CONCLUSION: The communication rate between company doctors and the curative sector in employees long absent with back pain is low. Communication consists of exchange of information rather than co-operation towards a mutual policy. Although according to many company doctors the curative sector plays an inhibitive role in return to work, they do not communicate accordingly.

Absenteeism