PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8160375

Simultaneity in the Ternus configuration: psychophysical data and a computer model.

Abstract

The Ternus configuration is an apparent motion display which is typically described as being bistable; subjects usually describe seeing either element motion or group motion, depending upon temporal properties of the display. The results of an experiment are reported in which subjects are also permitted to report seeing four stationary display elements (simultaneity). It was found that simultaneity was produced when both frame durations and interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were brief. A weaker than expected effect of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was revealed because this third type of judgment was obtained. Furthermore, statistical analyses indicated that SOA was not by itself the best predictor of judgment type. The interaction between duration and ISI was also an important predictor. This suggested that a complete account of the Ternus configuration requires two mechanisms: a visible persistence mechanism, governed by an SOA law, and a motion correspondence mechanism, governed by an ISI law. These two mechanisms were added to Dawson's (1991) [Psychological Review, 98, 569-603] autoassociative network for motion correspondence processing. The resulting model could generate each of the three interpretations of the Ternus configuration at appropriate combinations of frame duration and ISI.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M R Dawson, R D Wright. 1994. Simultaneity in the Ternus configuration: psychophysical data and a computer model.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)90098-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.

The authors present a computational model that builds a holographic lexicon representing both word meaning and word order from unsupervised experience with natural language. The model uses simple convolution and superposition mechanisms (cf. B. B. Murdock, 1982) to learn distributed holographic representations for words. The structure of the resulting lexicon can account for empirical data from classic experiments studying semantic typicality, categorization, priming, and semantic constraint in sentence completions. Furthermore, order information can be retrieved from the holographic representations, allowing the model to account for limited word transitions without the need for built-in transition rules. The model demonstrates that a broad range of psychological data can be accounted for directly from the structure of lexical representations learned in this way, without the need for complexity to be built into either the processing mechanisms or the representations. The holographic representations are an appropriate knowledge representation to be used by higher order models of language comprehension, relieving the complexity required at the higher level.

Association↗

Separating bias and sensitivity in judgments of associative memory.

Ratings of the degree of association between words are linearly related to normed associative strengths, but the intercept is high, and the slope is shallow (the judgments of associative memory [JAM] function). Two experiments included manipulations intended to decrease the intercept and increase the slope. Discrimination training on many pairs of words and constraining ratings to sum to a constant both reduced the intercept but failed to change the slope. The intercept of the JAM function appears to contain a bias component that can be manipulated independently of the slope, which reflects sensitivity to associative strengths.

Association↗

Transfer of noncorresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task.

Four experiments examined transfer of noncorresponding spatial stimulus-response associations to an auditory Simon task for which stimulus location was irrelevant. Experiment 1 established that, for a horizontal auditory Simon task, transfer of spatial associations occurs after 300 trials of practice with an incompatible mapping of auditory stimuli to keypress responses. Experiments 2-4 examined transfer effects within the auditory modality when the stimuli and responses were varied along vertical and horizontal dimensions. Transfer occurred when the stimuli and responses were arrayed along the same dimension in practice and transfer but not when they were arrayed along orthogonal dimensions. These findings indicate that prior task-defined associations have less influence on the auditory Simon effect than on the visual Simon effect, possibly because of the stronger tendency for an auditory stimulus to activate its corresponding response.

Association↗