PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8166588

Minimizing donor exposure in hemotherapy.

Abstract

As with any medical therapy, transfusion has risks and complications that are inherent in its application. There are also many options in standard approaches and alternatives to allogeneic transfusion to be considered that allow hemotherapy to be tailored to the patient's needs, maximizing benefit while reducing risk. Transfusion of standard, allogeneic components selected at random and derived from an altruistic donation by a community volunteer donor continue to comprise the majority of transfusions. However, many steps can be taken to minimize allogeneic exposure and its consequences. Transfusing only when the benefits are clinically important and justify the risks is probably most important. Options abound for pharmacologic intervention, altering collection systems and using the donor as his or her own source of blood to further reduce allogeneic exposure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J P AuBuchon. 1994. Minimizing donor exposure in hemotherapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8166588/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Variable adhesion of different red blood cell products to activated vascular endothelium under flow conditions.

Red blood cells (RBCs) that have been stored prior to transfusion show increased adherence to vascular endothelium in vitro, which suggests a potential for stored blood transfusion to impede blood flow in some patients. Transfusion is often required in patients with sepsis or inflammation; however, whether activation of endothelium affects stored RBC-endothelial cell (EC) interactions is unknown. We investigated whether storage time and leukocyte content of RBC products influences the adhesion of RBCs to activated ECs. RBCs from nonleukocyte-reduced (S-RBCs), buffy-coat-poor (BCP-RBCs), and leukocyte-filtered (LF-RBCs) products and cultured EC layers were pretreated with endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), or medium alone prior to perfusion of the RBCs across the EC layer in a continuous flow microchamber. After a single day of RBC storage, the number of adherent RBCs was increased in the endotoxin and TNF-alpha pretreated groups compared to the unactivated-control group. These differences were statistically significant for S-RBCs and LF-RBC products (P < 0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference in RBC adherence to activated and unactivated endothelium at other time-points of RBC product storage. The strength of adhesion of stored RBCs from S-RBC products to activated ECs was not altered following treatment; however, endotoxin significantly increased the adhesive strength of LF-RBCs to endothelium. These results demonstrate that while fresh RBCs show increased adhesion to activated endothelium, storage of RBCs did not promote increased adhesion to activated endothelium. However, inflammatory conditions promote stronger adhesion of stored RBCs to ECs, which may contribute to impaired tissue perfusion in some transfusion recipients.

Blood Component Removal↗

Endotoxin apheresis for sepsis.

The principle use of apheresis in the treatment of sepsis may be summarized as the removal of toxic substances and the restoration of normal organs function. It is ideal to control the early phases of inflammatory cascade when treating sepsis by removing microbial components, such as endotoxin or peptidoglycan. This review discusses endotoxin apheresis with particular emphasis on treatment using polymyxin B immobilized fiber columns (Toraymyxin) which are used widely in Japan for endotoxin removal therapy in patients with septic shock. Lixelle and CTR which have recently been shown to remove circulating bacterial components are also included in this review.

Blood Component Removal↗