PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8175221

Echo Doppler diastolic function and exercise tolerance.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible association between Doppler left ventricular filling pattern and exercise capacity in a group of normotensives to severe hypertensive patients. BACKGROUND: Invasive left ventricular filling indexes evaluated at rest are reported to be related to exercise capacity in heart failure. Whether exercise capacity is limited by abnormalities of left ventricular filling also in other less severe conditions is however unclear. METHODS: Fifty-one subjects with normal to severely elevated blood pressure underwent a standard exercise test on cycle ergometer, negative for myocardial ischemia, and a complete echo Doppler evaluation showing a basal systolic function within normal limits. RESULTS: Basal systolic function indexes were not significantly related to exercise duration. On the contrary, exercise duration was highly significantly correlated to the relative atrial contribution to left ventricular filling (0.001 < P < 0.05), in both the overall group and the two subgroups in whom exercise was interrupted because of fatigue (n = 30) or because of attaining target heart rate (n = 21). Significant correlations were also observed between exercise time and resting blood pressure, whereas no association with resting heart rate, age and body surface area was found. Exercise time also correlated to left ventricular mass and mass index but not to left ventricular volume. Multiple regression analysis showed that exercise tolerance was significantly related to diastolic blood pressure and left ventricular filling. Echo Doppler indexes of left ventricular filling are associated with exercise duration; left ventricular diastole could thus influence effort tolerance, not only in patients with cardiac insufficiency, but also in subjects with normal to elevated blood pressure levels and normal systolic function at rest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Genovesi-Ebert, C Marabotti, C Palombo, S Giaconi, G Rossi, S Ghione. 1994. Echo Doppler diastolic function and exercise tolerance.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5273(94)90092-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of dietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for 1996 to May 1994. We contacted authors of eligible trials to ensure accuracy and completeness of data and to identify unpublished trials. STUDY SELECTION: We included any study in which investigators randomized people to calcium supplementation or placebo and measured blood pressure for at least 2 weeks. Fifty-six articles met the inclusion criteria, and 33 were eligible for analysis, involving a total of 2412 patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Two pairs of independent reviewers abstracted data and assessed validity according to six quality criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: We calculated the differences in blood pressure change between the calcium supplementation group and the control group and pooled the estimates, with each trial weighted with the inverse of the variance using a random-effects model. Predictors of blood pressure reduction that we examined included method of supplementation, baseline blood pressure, and the methodological quality of the studies. The pooled analysis showed a reduction in systolic blood pressure of -1.27 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.25 to -0.29 mm Hg; P=.01) and in diastolic blood pressure of -0.24 mm Hg (95% CI, -0.92 to 0.44 mm Hg; P=.49). None of the possible mediators of blood pressure reduction explained differences in treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium supplementation may lead to a small reduction in systolic but not diastolic blood pressure. The results do not exclude a larger, important effect of calcium on blood pressure in subpopulations. In particular, further studies should address the hypothesis that inadequate calcium intake is associated with increased blood pressure that can be corrected with calcium supplementation.

Blood Pressure

Acute cardiovascular effects of OPC-18790 in patients with congestive heart failure. Time- and dose-dependence analysis based on pressure-volume relations.

BACKGROUND: OPC-18790 is a water-soluble quinolinone derivative that shares the pharmacological properties of vesnarinone and that may be useful for treating heart failure. We studied the contribution and relative dose sensitivities of the inotropic, lusitropic, and vascular effects of OPC-18790 in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pressure-volume (PV) analysis was performed in 17 patients who received either 5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 (low dose, n = 10) or 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 (high dose, n = 7) OPC-18790 by 1-hour IV infusion. Right heart pressures and flow and left heart PV relations (conductance catheter) were measured at baseline and every 15 minutes during infusion. Transient inferior vena caval obstruction was used to determine PV relations. Both doses produced venodilation reflected by a 10% decline in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and a 30% fall in atrial and pulmonary artery pressures. Arterial dilation was four times greater at the high dose, with an approximately 40% fall in effective arterial elastance and systemic resistance. Contractility rose by 25% to 100% (depending on PV index) with both doses. Ventricular-arterial coupling (ratio of ventricular end-systolic to arterial elastances) was approximately 0.25 at baseline and doubled (or tripled) at low (or high) dose, correlating with improved efficiency. Isovolumetric relaxation shortened, whereas the diastolic PV relation was generally unchanged. Heart rate was unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: OPC-18790 has potent venous and arterial vasodilator effects and moderate inotropic and lusitropic effects without a change in heart rate. These combined actions suggest a unique potential of OPC-18790 for heart failure treatment.

Blood Pressure

Lack of reproducibility in pregnancy of Korotkoff phase IV as measured by mercury sphygmomanometry.

BACKGROUND: Since hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are common, blood pressure is frequently measured in all pregnant women. Many authorities recommend that Korotkoff phase IV (K4, muffling of sound) is taken as the diastolic identification point measured on mercury sphygmomanometry in pregnancy because of reports that phase V (K5, disappearance of sound) is at or near to zero cuff pressure in some pregnant women. We compared the identification and reproducibility of K4 and K5 by observers unaware of each other's results. METHODS: In the first part of the study, two pairs of observers each took 340 measurements in 85 pregnant women. The second part of the study consisted of 1120 measurements in 80 pregnant and 80 non-pregnant women by five pairs of observers. Measurements were taken simultaneously by sphygmomanometry with a shared cuff and diaphragm; the observers were in separate booths. FINDINGS: K5 was identified in all measurements by both observers and never approached zero. K4 was heard in only 52% of measurements; in 33% of cases it was heard by only one of the pair of observers, so the pair agreed on its detection in only 19% of readings. Visual analogue scores used to assess Korotkoff sound quality indicated that systolic blood pressure was perceived significantly more clearly than diastolic blood pressure (K4 or K5). Even when K4 was heard by both observers, agreement on its value was poor (78% within 5 mm Hg vs 86% for K5, p < 0.05). K4 was heard significantly less often in non-pregnant women (32% of measurements). There was also no consistency in the identification of K4 within individual women. INTERPRETATION: K4 has little value in clinical management because it cannot be reproduced accurately. We recommend that K4 should be replaced by K5 as the measure of diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy.

Blood Pressure