PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8176868

[Development of hormone assay methods].

Abstract

Before the introduction of radioimmunoassay most hormones were measured by bioassay and/or chemical methods. The sensitivity of these methods was low, so large amounts of samples were needed to perform hormone determinations. In 1959, Berson and Yalow, first applied radioimmunoassay to the measurement of insulin, after which many protein hormones were determined by this method. Subsequently, radioimmunoassays were developed for small peptide molecules as well as for non-peptide hormones such as thyroid hormones and steroid hormones. Two site immunoradiometric assay in which one antibody was immobilized and another labeled with 125I becomes popular, due to its high sensitivity and the development of monoclonal antibody production by the hybridoma technique. Although radioimmunoassays immunoradiometric assays are sensitive and robust techniques, there has been a growing interest for non-istotopic alternatives since early 1980s. Recently, non-istopic immunoassay methods utilizing chemiluminescence, fluorescence and enzymes as labels are widely used. Chemiluminescence immunoassays, fluorescence immunoassays and enzymic immunoassays with fluorometric detection have resulted in sensitivities adequate to replace radioimmunoassays. Since hormone immunoassays are all dependent upon immunologic properties of hormones, the simultaneous measurement of hormones by a biologic method sometimes shows discrepancies in the hormone concentrations. Hormone assay methods employing biologically specific receptors was introduced, but used not so widely due to the unstability of hormone receptors. In vitro bioassay, is easy to perform and has high sensitivity and applicable for definite hormones. Isotopic and non-isotopic immunoassays are simple and quite useful, but other methods such as radioreceptor assay and bioassay-especially in vitro bioassay are also recommendable to run with radioimmunoassays.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Y Miyachi. 1994. [Development of hormone assay methods].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8176868/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The differential effects of stress on memory consolidation and retrieval: a potential involvement of reconsolidation? Theoretical comment on Beckner et al. (2006).

Previous experiments in the field of stress and memory have suggested a facilitative effect of stress hormones on the consolidation of information but an impairing effect on the retrieval of information. In the article "Stress Facilitates Consolidation of Verbal Memory for a Film but Does Not Affect Retrieval," V. E. Beckner, D. M. Tucker, Y. Delville, and D. C. Mohr (2006) report that exposure to an anticipatory psychological stress enhances consolidation, although it has no impact on the retrieval of previously learned information. This finding is discussed around the importance of the environmental context in which stress is applied and memory is measured. Here, the authors raise the possibility that the enhancing effects of stress on consolidation as reported by Beckner et al. may be explained by the fact that stress can act as a reactivation cue, leading to a 2nd round of consolidation, a process called reconsolidation.

Hormones↗

Interferences in hormone immunoassays.

Despite the numerous potential interferences that were discussed in this article, immunoassays, in general, are robust measurement systems. There is no practical way to identify specimens a priori that are likely to have immunoassay interference. Therefore, laboratories must rely on communication from clinicians to identify suspicious test values that may be caused by assay interference. After laboratories are alerted, multiple investigations can be undertaken. The common causes of immunoassay interferences (see Box I) are dependent on the analytic format. Competitive assays are most likely to have problems with cross-reactivity, whereas immunometric assays most often have problems with heterophile antibodies. The simple steps to test for dilutional linearity, spiked recovery, heterophile antibody blocking,and testing with alternate technology can help in the evaluations of cases that are suspected to have assay interference.

Hormones↗