PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8179788

Imaging for predictable maxillary implants.

Abstract

Whereas other radiographs may be adequate for assessment of mandibular anterior implant sites, the use of computerised tomography is recommended for evaluating potential implant sites in the maxillae. A complete denture replica with appropriate radiopaque markers aids in the assessment. Hounsfield densitometric measurements provide additional information on the quality of available bone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N A Duckmanton, B W Austin, S K Lechner, I J Klineberg. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8179788/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Problems associated with implant rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla.

Implant rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla is one of the most challenging endeavors that faces the restorative dentist. Comprehensive diagnosis and precise evaluation of the patient's needs followed by appropriate treatment planning provide the restorative dentist with the necessary tools to satisfy patient expectations and the realization that this patient would greatly benefit from this treatment or that the patient should be referred to a prosthodontist for further evaluation. Not enough emphasis can be placed on adequate placement of the implants by the surgeon. As with any rehabilitation, aesthetics are of prime importance to the patient, and proper occlusion confers longevity to the prosthesis. Whether a removable or fixed implant-supported prosthesis is fabricated, every step is crucial and is reflected in the final product. When all sequences of treatment are properly executed, the successful implant rehabilitation of the maxilla is one of the most gratifying procedures for both the restorative dentist and the patient.

Dental Implantation, Endosseous

Resection and immediate microvascular reconstruction in the management of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible.

BACKGROUND: Management of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) remains a difficult and challenging problem. The traditional approach using debridement, antibiotics, and occasionally hyperbaric oxygen is usually successful in treating minimal ORN. However, when bone and soft-tissue necrosis is extensive, the conservative approach usually requires intensive care over a long period of time and often yields unsatisfactory functional and cosmetic results. METHODS: Within the past 5 years, we have used radical resection of the mandible with immediate microvascular reconstruction in the treatment of extensive ORN of the mandible. This aggressive surgical approach was used in six patients with advanced ORN of the mandible, all of whom had failed initial conservative treatment, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy in three. A fibular free graft with microvascular anastomosis was used in all patients. RESULTS: All the patients healed primarily with minimal postoperative morbidity and excellent cosmetic results. Two patients subsequently required removal of some of their hardware. One patient had placement of osseointegrated implants with an excellent cosmetic and functional result. CONCLUSION: Microvascular reconstruction with its own blood supply seems to expedite bone healing and limit further osteoradionecrosis of the remaining mandible. Although prevention is the primary goal in radiation injury, our experience suggests that radical resection with free microvascular reconstruction offers significant advantages to selected patients with extensive ORN of the mandible.

Dental Implantation, Endosseous