PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8194916

Data utilization and analytical skills among mid-level health programme managers in a developing country.

B P Loevinsohn
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mid-level health managers in a developing country were studied to examine the extent to which they are able to use and analyse data they receive from a new health information system. Among 168 managers filling out a self-administered questionnaire, 52% could compute a simple cost-effectiveness ratio and 27% were able to calculate proportions. Only 43% of the managers were able to construct a cumulative graph similar to the one recommended by WHO. Facility with these tasks was not related to levels of training or age. Twelve out of 25 programme managers interviewed in depth did not know how well their particular programme had performed in the previous year. Similarly, only six of these managers knew their best and poorest performing districts. The results of this study suggest; 1) Training managers in data analysis and use is critical if health information systems are to actually improve health care delivery. 2) Data intended for the use of programme managers need to be presented in simple ways. 3) Further social research is required to understand how managers perceive and use data. 4) Efforts to ensure the use of data should not be seen as something to be 'added on' after information systems are in place.

Explore related subjects

Data Interpretation, StatisticalDeveloping CountriesEducational StatusEpidemiologyHealth PersonnelHealth ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicSelf DisclosureSurveys and QuestionnairesAdministrative PersonnelCommunicationCritiqueData AnalysisDelivery Of Health CareHealthInformation NetworksOrganization And AdministrationProgram EvaluationProgramsQuestionnairesResearch MethodologyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B P Loevinsohn. 1994. Data utilization and analytical skills among mid-level health programme managers in a developing country.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije%2F23.1.194

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality.

Clinicians and health service researchers are frequently interested in predicting patient-specific probabilities of adverse events (e.g. death, disease recurrence, post-operative complications, hospital readmission). There is an increasing interest in the use of classification and regression trees (CART) for predicting outcomes in clinical studies. We compared the predictive accuracy of logistic regression with that of regression trees for predicting mortality after hospitalization with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We also examined the predictive ability of two other types of data-driven models: generalized additive models (GAMs) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). We used data on 9484 patients admitted to hospital with an AMI in Ontario. We used repeated split-sample validation: the data were randomly divided into derivation and validation samples. Predictive models were estimated using the derivation sample and the predictive accuracy of the resultant model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the validation sample. This process was repeated 1000 times-the initial data set was randomly divided into derivation and validation samples 1000 times, and the predictive accuracy of each method was assessed each time. The mean ROC curve area for the regression tree models in the 1000 derivation samples was 0.762, while the mean ROC curve area of a simple logistic regression model was 0.845. The mean ROC curve areas for the other methods ranged from a low of 0.831 to a high of 0.851. Our study shows that regression trees do not perform as well as logistic regression for predicting mortality following AMI. However, the logistic regression model had performance comparable to that of more flexible, data-driven models such as GAMs and MARS.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed2007

Multiple linear regression with some correlated errors: classical and robust methods.

In this paper we consider classical and robust methods of estimation and diagnostics for the multiple linear regression model when some of the errors are correlated. This work was motivated by the analysis of a medical data set, from an observational study aimed at identifying factors affecting the outcome of a surgical method for the correction of scoliosis (abnormal lateral spinal curvature). There are 392 observations but some of them are on the same patient (double curves). It seems adequate to consider a multiple linear regression model but, since it is not desirable to discard the double curves, the assumption of non-correlated errors is clearly violated, and this is indeed confirmed by related diagnostics on the residuals (Durbin-Watson test). A more appropriate model retains the linear structure but allows for non-null correlation between the errors on the same patient. We propose two different procedures for the estimation of the parameters of the linear model and the correlation parameters: maximum likelihood assuming normal errors and a robustified version obtained by plugging-in results from robust linear regression. The latter procedure is designed to be resistant to outlying observations or error distributions with heavy tails and has produced the most satisfactory results for the analysed data set.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed2007

Adaptive design method based on sum of p-values.

Bauer and Kohne proposed an adaptive design using Fisher's combination of independent p-values based on subsamples from different stages (Biometrics 1994; 50(4):1029-1041). Their method provides great flexibility in the selection of statistical methods for hypothesis testing of subsamples. However, the choices for the stopping boundaries are not flexible enough to meet practical needs (Biometrics 2001; 57(3): 886-891). In this paper, an adaptive design method is proposed using linear combination of the independent p-values. The method provides great flexibility in the selection of stopping boundaries and no numerical integration is required for the two-stage designs. The stopping boundaries and p-values can be calculated manually. The operating characteristics of the adaptive designs are studied using computer simulations with and without sample size adjustment. Examples are presented for superiority and non-inferiority trials with different endpoints (normal, binary, and survival) under different adaptations. The statistical efficiency of the proposed method is compared with other methods based on conditional power.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗