PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8198508

Wedge factors for rectangular fields.

Abstract

The variation of wedge factor with field size was measured for a range of square and rectangular fields for 45 degrees and 60 degrees wedges. Measurements were performed on accelerators with both externally mounted wedges, the Varian 600C of nominal energy 6MV and internally mounted wedges, the Philips SL75/5 of nominal energy 6MV and the Philips SL25 of nominal energy 25MV. Analysis of the results confirm previous investigations reported in the literature of the variation of wedge factor with field size and in particular the significantly greater variation for internally mounted wedges. A wedge factor for a rectangular field based on the wedge factor of the open field equivalent square gives a maximum error of 1.5%. A wedge factor for a rectangular field based on the wedge factor of the square field of equal area reduces the maximum error to 0.5% for all three accelerators. Analysis of results reported in the literature show a similar reduction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Arthur. 1994. Wedge factors for rectangular fields.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8198508/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Whole body doses from linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to measure whole body radiation doses in a humanoid phantom from linear accelerator-based cranial stereotactic radiosurgery/therapy (SRS/T), using different beam arrangements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A standard noncoplanar five-arc beam arrangement and a four-arc technique without a sagittal arc were used to deliver 20 Gy in a single fraction to a midline spherical target volume in the corpus callosum region of an Alderson-Rando anthropomorphic phantom using (i) a 20-mm and (ii) a 40-mm circular collimator. Whole body dose measurements were made using lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimetry. Whole body isodose plots in the sagittal and coronal planes and organ doses were compared for the two arcing beam arrangements. An ionization chamber was used to record the exit dose at intervals along the length of the phantom at midline and 4.5 cm off-axis for (i) a single fixed field and (ii) a solitary 90 degrees sagittal arc using a 40-mm circular collimator. RESULTS: The sagittal arc was the major contributor to neck and trunk doses when the five- and four-arc arrangements were compared, with fourfold greater thyroid dose. The gonad dose was increased by the sagittal arc, but was largely due to leakage radiation. The dose from a fixed field exiting down the long axis of the phantom was tenfold greater than that from a solitary 90 degrees sagittal arc. When the fixed field or arc traversed the lung or exited through the pharynx and major upper airways, the dose measurements below the diaphragm were 30-40% higher than those along the exit path of maximum soft tissue density. CONCLUSION: When SRS/T is used in nonmalignant conditions such as cranial arteriovenous malformations or benign tumors the exit paths of arcing beams or fixed fields should be taken into account when deciding upon the final treatment plan. Such consideration should minimize the risk of radiation-induced malignancy, notably in the thyroid gland of younger patients.

Particle Accelerators

Dynamic collimator and dose rate control: enabling technology for enhanced dynamic wedge.

The key features that make dynamic dose delivery possible in the Enhanced Dynamic Wedge application are computerized position and control of the independent collimating jaws and computerized dynamic control of the linear accelerator dose rate. These features will be described and related to the current implementation of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge.

Particle Accelerators

Dosimetry measurement tools for commissioning enhanced dynamic wedge.

Measurement of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge parameters requires that the dose at a measurement point be integrated during the entire exposure as the moving jaw closes to form the dose distribution. This major difference from static fields, where dose rate measurements can be made using a single moving probe, requires major modification in measurement techniques to use devices which can measure multiple points within the field simultaneously. Each of these new tools introduce unique problems in dose measurement, which must be understood prior to their use. This paper discusses these tools.

Particle Accelerators