PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8202997

Stroke: the way things really are.

P Scheinberg
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To comply with governmental requirements regarding the validity of therapeutic modalities and for medico-legal purposes, it is important to distinguish between what has been scientifically proven and what is anecdotal in the prevention and management of stroke. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the evidence for many of the modalities used to prevent stroke in high-risk patients, including antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, and endarterectomy, and the limitations of each. Controversial therapeutic modalities for which no scientific proof exists, such as anticoagulation of progressing stroke, are also discussed. The term "standard of care" should apply to modalities proven to be effective by scientifically controlled studies, not because they are used by many physicians. Treatment of acute stroke is still disappointing despite the development of many promising pharmacological strategies in experimental animals. An important part of the reason may be that the window of therapeutic opportunity is much shorter than the usual entry time of patients in most clinical trials. This logistic problem merits serious attention. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous controlled, randomized, multiple-center clinical trials have demonstrated that the efficacy or lack thereof of various therapies directed at preventing or treating stroke can be determined and that anecdotal data may be misleading and harmful. At the least we should be aware of what we know and what we do not.

Explore related subjects

AnticoagulantsCerebrovascular DisordersClinical ProtocolsEndarterectomy, CarotidHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRisk FactorsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Scheinberg. 1994. Stroke: the way things really are.. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.6.1290

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Tetrahydro-isoquinoline-based factor Xa inhibitors.

Derivatives of (2-amidino-1,2,3, 4-tetrahydro-isoquinolin-7-yloxy)phenylacetic acid (TIPAC) were developed as inhibitors of factor Xa (fXa). The compounds are prepared using 15 synthetic steps on average. The most potent compounds (14, 17, 22-26) display inhibition constants of Ki = 21-55 nM but do not inhibit thrombin (Ki = 5->100 microM) and only weakly inhibit trypsin (Ki = 0.08-5 microM). They bear a second basic moiety, e.g., substituted 1-(iminomethyl)piperidines, which is linked to C-4 of the phenyl group of TIPAC via an oxygen atom. The inhibition constants of these compounds are almost independent of the size of the (iminomethyl)piperidine substituent. Due to the fact that fXa displays two cation binding sites, namely, the S1 and S4 sites, in principle two binding modes are conceivable for the novel dibasic fXa inhibitors. Molecular modeling experiments based on the X-ray structures of uninhibited fXa and the DX-9065a/fXa complex were carried out. The results taken together with the inhibition constants clearly favor one binding mode: the tetrahydro-isoquinoline fills the S1 pocket even better than the naphthalene moiety of DX-9065a, and the (iminomethyl)piperidine residues occupy the S4 site.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1998

Abbreviated hospitalization for deep venous thrombosis with the use of ardeparin.

BACKGROUND: Ardeparin sodium has recently received approval by the Food and Drug Administration for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total knee replacement. However, this low-molecular-weight heparin has not been previously evaluated in a randomized controlled trial for treatment of established acute deep venous thrombosis. METHODS: The study included patients with ultrasound-documented acute symptomatic deep venous thrombosis of the legs. They had to be deemed appropriate for discharge home to receive subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. Patients were randomized to receive ardeparin with a 2-day hospitalization or unfractionated heparin sodium with a 5-day hospitalization. Both groups received warfarin sodium. Follow-up ultrasound examinations were undertaken at 6 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients enrolled, 75 had follow-up ultrasonography. Evaluation of baseline vs 6-week venous scans demonstrated that, overall, 31 of the 39 ardeparin-treated patients improved, compared with 21 of the 36 patients assigned to receive unfractionated heparin (P=.05). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in improvement was 0.6% to 42% in favor of ardeparin. Median charges for ardeparin and unfractionated heparin were $2815 and $6500, respectively (P<.001). There were no differences in bleeding or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this small preliminary trial suggest that ardeparin can be administered effectively and safely to selected patients with acute deep venous thrombosis and that, with proper nursing and home services, it can help decrease the duration of hospitalization.

Anticoagulants↗