PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8209974

Basic simulations for anaesthetists. A pilot study of the ACCESS system.

A J Byrne·P J Hilton·J N Lunn
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper describes the design and initial testing of the ACCESS (Anaesthetic Computer Controlled Emergency Situation Simulator) system, which has been designed to simulate anaesthetic emergencies with the aim of providing training for junior doctors. The simulations require little or no capital expenditure with minimal use of time by staff or trainees. They are based on standard anaesthetic equipment, with a microcomputer providing an image of commonly used instruments. Problems are presented as scenarios administered by the teacher, and test the skills of the pupil. During 64 scenarios, five trainees caused two 'deaths' and solved the problems in a median time of 2.5 min, while an experienced group of anaesthetists caused one 'death' and took 1.8 min. The simulation was rated by the pupils as easy to use, realistic and a valuable educational tool.

Explore related subjects

AnesthesiologyBradycardiaChildComputer SimulationComputer SystemsComputer-Assisted InstructionDrug ContaminationEducation, Medical, GraduateEmergenciesHumansHypotensionIntraoperative ComplicationsManikinsPilot ProjectsTachycardia, VentricularJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Byrne, P J Hilton, J N Lunn. 1994. Basic simulations for anaesthetists. A pilot study of the ACCESS system.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03466.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗