PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8217679

Managing malignant ulcers effectively.

Abstract

This article aims to bring together current methods of research, thinking and practice related to the treatment and care of patients with a malignant ulcer. With appropriate care and treatment, interventions can effectively decrease social isolation and anxiety while increasing cosmetic comfort for the sufferers of this distressing problem. It is important to stress that the psychological support and interventions offered to this client group are of equal importance as the level of physiological treatment and care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Cooper, J Cooper. Managing malignant ulcers effectively.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.8.2.25.s42

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Toxic shock syndrome].

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare, life-threatening, acute multisystem illness usually characterized by sudden onset of high fever, diffuse sunburn-like erythroderma and a variety of other signs and symptoms. It may progress rapidly to hypotension and shock with multiple organ failure. Its exact cause is unknown, but in almost all cases there has been an infection with exotoxin-producing strains of phage group I Staphylococcus aureus. Although initially described in association with the use of superabsorbent tampons in menstruation, TSS has complicated a variety of surgical procedures. Recently in head and neck surgery attention has focused on absorbent packing materials, such as those used in postoperative nasal care. TSS developed in a 12-year-old 28 hours after tonsillectomy, nasal septoplasty and inferior turbinectomy in which absorbent packing material was used. It is important to maintain a high index of suspicion for TSS in all postoperative patients with fever, hypotension and erythroderma.

Bandages

Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome varies from mild oedema to incapacitating swelling with pain and ulceration. We investigated the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome after a first episode of deep-vein thrombosis and assessed the preventive effect of direct application of a sized-to-fit graded compression stocking. METHODS: Patients with a first episode of venogram-proven proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomly assigned no stockings (the control group) or made-to-measure graded compression elastic stockings for at least 2 years. Post-thrombotic syndrome was assessed with a standard scoring system that combined clinical characteristics and objective leg measurements. Patients were assessed every 3 months during the first 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter for at least 5 years. The cumulative incidence of mild-to-moderate post-thrombotic syndrome was the primary outcome measure. FINDINGS: Of the 315 consecutive outpatients considered for inclusion, 44 were excluded and 77 did not consent to take part. 194 patients were randomly assigned compression stockings (n = 96) or no stockings (n = 98). The median follow-up was 76 months (range 60-96) in both groups. Mild-to-moderate post-thrombotic syndrome (score > or = 3 plus one clinical sign) occurred in 19 (20%) patients in the stocking group and in 46 (47%) control-group patients (p < 0.001). 11 (11%) patients in the stocking group developed severe post-thrombotic syndrome (score > or = 4), compared with 23 (23%) patients in the control group (p < 0.001). In both groups, most cases of post-thrombotic syndrome occurred within 24 months of the acute thrombotic event. INTERPRETATION: About 60% of patients with a first episode of proximal deep-vein thrombosis develop post-thrombotic syndrome within 2 years. A sized-to-fit compression stocking reduced this rate by about 50%.

Bandages

[Principles for thrombosis prevention at surgery departments in Denmark].

In 1995 all surgical departments in Denmark were asked to reply to a questionnaire about their use of postoperative thromboprophylaxis. Response rate was 95%. Ninety-two percent of the departments performing major surgery routinely used prophylaxis, in 84% of these according to prior written instructions, but still only 36% use prophylaxis in emergency surgery. The indications and methods used are in accordance with recommendations in the literature. The use of aspirin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism should be avoided, and the use of prophylaxis in emergency surgery should be improved. The most commonly used method was low molecular weight heparin (82%) often in combination with graduated elastic stockings. There is no longer any doubt about the need for prophylaxis. The tasks of the future are to identify the risk groups and establish the duration of prophylaxis.

Bandages