PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8229326

Occupational medicine training program surveys.

Abstract

Although the quantity of Occupational Medicine (OM) residents in training programs has risen in the past 15 years, there remains a significant shortage of OM physicians in the United States. A survey of OM residency program directors and residents and fellows (trainees) was accomplished to answer questions relevant to recruiting and supplying OM trained physicians. Twenty-six of 29 program directors (89.7%) replied. One hundred forty-three of 174 (82.2%) trainees responded. Fifty percent of responding program directors were satisfied with the current quantity of program applicants. Medical students were provided a median of 3 hours (range, 0 to 20 hours; mean, 5.35 hours) of formal OM teaching by the responding programs. Almost half of trainees, 68 (48.6%), did not receive formal OM instruction in medical school. An average of 5.4 +/- 13.3 hours of OM was taught to OM trainees in medical school. Disproportionate numbers of trainees were taught OM as fourth-year medical students and in other residencies. Reasons for pursuing OM training were diverse and often related to postgraduate clinical experience with OM. Only a total of 84 primary care residents (0.32%) rotate through the OM residency programs in an average year. We conclude that an insufficient quantity of qualified applicants, combined with limited exposure to OM in medical schools and low levels of contact with residents in primary care programs, will continue to hinder efforts to reduce the shortage of OM residents and physicians. Further training specifically targeting the fourth year of medical school and the primary care residencies may have the most impact on recruitment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Hegmann, P Barrier, R Moser. 1993. Occupational medicine training program surveys.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-199308000-00012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗