PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8232846

Attentional dyslexia: a single case study.

Abstract

A single case study of an attentional dyslexic is reported. The patient B.A.L. was able to read single letters and single words presented in isolation without difficulty. However, his reading of prose was very disrupted and his ability to read rows of letters and words was significantly impaired. A "flanking" procedure, in which there was a single target item, flanked by other stimuli, was used in a series of experiments to analyse his dyslexic impairment. First it was established that his attentional deficit was specific to reading in so far as the patient did not have comparable difficulties with pictorial material. His performance in the flanking experiments was consistently impaired; and furthermore was unaffected by speed of presentation, the number of flanking stimuli, and the spatial arrangement of the flanking stimuli. The important exception was when the flanking stimuli were of a different category. There was no decrement in performance when target letters were flanked by words or when words were flanked by letters. This study both corroborates and extends the original account of attentional dyslexia (Shallice and Warrnington, Neuropsychologia 15, 31-41, 1977) in terms of a damaged "filter" mechanism controlling the transition from a parallel to a serial stage of reading processing. The categorical effects reported here indicate that such a filter must be post lexical and suggest further that there are multiple filters in the reading system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E K Warrington, L Cipolotti, J McNeil. 1993. Attentional dyslexia: a single case study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(93)90145-p

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗