PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8244541

Resolving the casualty evacuation conflict.

T E Martin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the most contentious issues surrounding the prehospital management of the injured is the decision to stabilize on site or to rapidly evacuate the patient. Although there are vociferous proponents for both views, there appears to be little thought given to the rationalization of these decisions, and the subject has only merited lip-service in previous texts. Treatment choices and decisions in the prehospital environment are notoriously difficult to make. The doctor, unlike ambulance paramedics, does not necessarily work to didactic protocols and, if suitably trained, is at liberty to commence advanced resuscitation procedures at the roadside. However, these may be time consuming and, to be of greatest benefit to the patient, a fine balance between resuscitation and evacuation must be drawn. This paper aims to discuss some of the key issues which need to be considered in the prehospital scenario, such as treatment triage, evacuation priorities, mode of transportation and hospital destination. The end result must be to eliminate the medical 'bottleneck' and to afford early and appropriate definitive care to those in most need.

Explore related subjects

AircraftAmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMilitary PersonnelQuality of Health CareResuscitationTime FactorsTransportation of PatientsTriageUnited KingdomWounds and InjuriesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T E Martin. 1993. Resolving the casualty evacuation conflict.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(93)90025-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Individual and collective doses from cosmic radiation in Ireland.

This paper assesses the individual and collective doses in Ireland due to cosmic radiation. Information on the exposure to cosmic radiation at ground level is reviewed and published data on the frequency of routes flown by Irish residents is used to calculate the dose due to air travel. Occupational exposure of aircrew is also evaluated. Experimental data on cosmic radiation exposure at ground level is in good agreement with international estimates and the average individual dose is calculated as 300 microSv annually. Published data on international air travel by Irish residents shows a 50% increase in the number of flights taken between 2001 and 2005. This increase is primarily on short-haul flights to Europe, but there have been significant percentage increases in all long-haul flights, with the exception of flights to Africa. The additional per capita dose due to air travel is estimated to be 45 muSv, of which 51% is accumulated on European routes and 34% on routes to the United States. Exposure of aircrew to cosmic radiation is now controlled by legislation and all airlines holding an Air Operator's Certificate issued by the Irish Aviation Authority are required to report annually the doses received by their employees in the previous year. There has been a 75% increase in the number of aircrew receiving doses >1 mSv since 2002. In 2004 and 2005 the average individual doses received by Irish aircrew were 1.8 and 2.0, mSv, respectively. The corresponding per caput dose for the entire population is <3 muSv. While this is low compared with the per caput doses from other sources of cosmic radiation, aircrew exposure represents a higher collective dose than any other identified group of exposed workers in Ireland.

Aircraft↗
PubMed2007

[Intraosseous puncture in preclinical emergency medicine. Ten years experience in air rescue service].

INTRODUCTION: The intraosseous puncture (IO) is a fast and safe alternative to the puncture of peripheral veins in emergency situations in children < or =6 years of age. The purpose of this paper is to summarize 10 years of experience on the prehospital use of the IO method by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) "Christoph 22", Ulm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2005. RESULTS: Out of a total of 9,549 missions, the proportion of children was 11.1%. In 27 children (4.2% of the children < or =6 years of age) an IO puncture was performed. Patients of the IO group were younger (1.0 vs. 3.7 years of age; p<0.001) and showed a higher degree of injury severity (NACA 6 vs. 4; p<0.001) compared to the total children group. In all children of the IO group (100%), the intraosseous puncture was the method of first choice to obtain access to the vascular system by the HEMS team. In 96.4% of these cases (26/27), the first IO puncture attempt was successful - in one child, a second puncture attempt was necessary. A standardized puncture technique was performed using the proximal tibia. The time required for successful placement of the IO infusion line was 60 s or less in all cases. In 37% of the cases (10/27) the IO infusion line was used for induction of general anaesthesia; dosage and onset of administered drugs were described as being equivalent to a peripheral infusion line. In all cases, the IO needle was replaced in-hospital within 2 h by a central or peripheral iv line. No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The IO infusion technique is a simple, fast and safe alternative method for emergency access to the vascular system in children < or =6 years of age in the prehospital setting.

Aircraft↗
PubMed2007

Airborne baloney.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aircraft↗