PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8245271

Assessing smoking patterns and motives.

Abstract

This article focuses on measures used to assess smoking patterns and motives. Self-report typology scales demonstrate a remarkably stable factor structure and good reliability. However, self-monitoring studies suggest that typology scales do not accurately assess smoking patterns and do not provide a good basis for treatment planning. Nevertheless, typology scores are correlated with variables such as smoking rate, craving, and cessation outcomes. These correlations may largely be accounted for by a common underlying factor, here labeled smoking drive, which may serve as a measure of dependence. Finally, the article briefly introduces new methods for assessing smoking patterns using palm-top computers to track smoking and other stimuli in real time. These methods may provide more valid assessment of smoking patterns.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Shiffman. 1993. Assessing smoking patterns and motives.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0022-006x.61.5.732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and quality of life issues in restless legs syndrome.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a generally underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. It is a common cause of sleep disturbance that can severely disrupt normal life functioning. However, because of the failure to recognize RLS as a distinct disorder, clinicians have minimized the significance of the morbidity experienced by some patients. A positive family history is present in >50% of patients with RLS. Indeed, a person with RLS is 3 to 6 times more likely to have a positive family history of RLS than is an individual who does not have the disease. The differential diagnosis of RLS includes both movement and sleep disorders. Establishing an accurate diagnosis is crucial because effective treatment is available. In 2002, RLS experts revised diagnostic criteria and established 4 essential criteria for the diagnosis. Assessing the most bothersome symptoms and quantifying the severity of RLS are important because not all patients require medical therapy. Moreover, therapy may vary according to which symptom represents the major problem.

Depression↗