PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8248401

Classification of mandibular defects.

Abstract

A classification of mandibular defects based on functional as well as aesthetic factors is presented. By taking into account the difficulties in restoring form and function and not simply relying on traditional anatomic landmarks, it is hoped that this method will allow different types of reconstructions to be fairly evaluated. It also should help surgeons to tailor individual reconstructive techniques to specific clinical situations. Major difficulties in mandibular reconstruction arise when a condyle requires replacement, when there is a mucosal and/or skin component to the defect, and when the area to be reconstructed involves the anterior arch. The classification is based on three upper-case and three lower-case characters: H, C, L and o, m, s. H defects are lateral defects of any length, including the condyle but not significantly crossing the midline; L defects are the same only without the condyle; C defects consist of the entire central segment containing the four incisors and the two canines. Combinations of these letters are possible (an angle-to-angle defect, for example, is represented as LCL). Thus H and L defects may reach or even extend slightly beyond the midline but are not referred to as LC or HC unless they contain the entire central segment. The letters o (neither a skin nor a mucosal component), s (skin), m (mucosa), and sm (skin plus mucosa) are added to denote the epithelial requirement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J B Boyd, P J Gullane, L E Rotstein, D H Brown, J C Irish. 1993. Classification of mandibular defects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8248401/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stacked plating for metadiaphyseal fractures of the distal radius: a technique report.

Combined injuries of the distal radius and shaft are rare, are usually caused by high energy, and pose a surgical dilemma. Surgical tactics and implants that are routinely used either for isolated fractures of the distal radius or for fractures of the radial shaft are often not applicable for this combined injury. We describe a technique of dual-stacked plating for these metadiaphyseal fractures and its use in two patients.

Bone Plates↗

Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies.

The management of intra-articular distal humeral fractures remains a difficult surgical problem. Although an olecranon osteotomy provides excellent exposure for management of these fractures, a number of complications can occur after the creation and repair of the osteotomy including nonunion, malunion, hardware failure, and pain secondary to prominent hardware. In an effort to reduce the incidence of these complications, the senior authors now use contoured 3.5 mm reconstruction plates for the fixation of their apex-distal chevron olecranon osteotomies. Two surgeons at a single institution used this technique of exposure on a series of 17 consecutive patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures between 1996 and 1999. In this series, all osteotomies united. There was one complication related specifically to the osteotomy: one of the screws in the plate penetrated the proximal radioulnar joint, interfering with forearm rotation; a second procedure was required to shorten the screw. Only one of the 17 patients requested plate removal during the 32 month (average) follow-up period. Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies using a 3.5 mm reconstruction plate provides a construct with predictable healing and few complications. The overall results using this technique are comparable with other reported methods in the literature.

Bone Plates↗