PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8252080

[Andrologic problems in prostatic carcinoma].

Abstract

In our opinion, the attempt to save the sexuality and the erectile ability in a patient with a prostate cancer, in the respect of an absolute oncological radicality, should be recommended since potency represents for the patient a primary aspect in the quality of residual life. At the Institute of Urology of the University of Milan a study to identify pathogenetic mechanisms leading to erectile failure in the various phases of a prostate cancer was performed. From January 1988 to December 1993, 36 patients (range 50-60 years old) suffering from prostate cancer B1 stage (14 pts), B2 (20 pts) and C (2 pts) underwent to radical prostatectomy. Out of 24 pts reporting erectile ability before surgery, 10 was in B1 stage and underwent monolateral nerve-sparing technique. Out of these, 6 pts (60%) maintained the erection after the operation. The treatment with LHRH analogues weighted on loss of libido and erectile and erectile potent due to central androgenic delete. At our Institute 87 pts in treatment with LHRH analogues reported loss of erection in 80% of cases. In this group 22 underwent to an andrological examination. The exams (Dynamic penile Doppler, Dynamic Cavernosometry and stimulating test with intracavernous vasoactive drugs) confirm the absence of peripherical damages in the pathogenesis of the erectile dysfunction. Patient underwent radiotherapy develop a secondary impotence due to an obliterant progressive angioitis in a percentage ranging from 30 to 80%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Austoni, F Colombo, F Mantovani, O Fenice, D Vecchio. 1993. [Andrologic problems in prostatic carcinoma].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8252080/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Short history of erectile dysfunction treatment].

Since the origin, the man tried by all possible means to restor his erectile capacity. The obscurantism prevailed for a long time. We had to wait up to the turn of the 19th Century with Freud to get that things evolve a little bit. In the Fifties, the first penile prostheses were developed by Goodwin and Scott. In the Sixties, the behavioral therapies by Masters and Johnson. The Eighties represent the pharmacological revolution with the discovery of the effects of papaverin by Virag, then the E1 prostaglandin by Ishii, as well as the inhibitors of the 5 phospho di esterase (sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil) following studies on nitric oxide by Ignarro, Nobel Prize of medicine in 1998.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability in the volume of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) performed by urologists in the USA, and the physician characteristics that predict RP volume, as previous studies showed that individual surgeon volume for RP is associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a nationwide, representative survey of 2000 urologists who treat prostate carcinoma in the USA, we asked respondents to indicate a numerical range of RPs they perform each year (none, 1-10, 11-30, and >30, the last which we defined as 'high volume'). We then identified characteristics of the provider and practice associated with a high volume of RPs. Supplementing survey results with other national data, we estimated the proportion of all RPs in the USA performed by 'high-volume' urologists. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 66.1% (1313 urologists) with no differences between the respondents and non-respondents for the measured demographic variables. Among urologists who performed RPs (89.1% of the sample), 37.3% did < or = 10, 46.9% 11-30 and 15.8% >30 RPs/year. Academic and urological oncology fellowship-trained urologists were, respectively, 41% and 27% more likely than private-practice and non-fellowship-trained urologists to have a high volume of RPs. Of all RPs performed yearly in the USA, only an estimated 46.1% were by high-volume urologists. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of urologists report a RP volume that might be associated with higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound-healing, and genitourinary complications. Further study is needed to characterize the possible relationships between RP volume and tumour recurrence, survival, and long-term erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

Erectile Dysfunction↗