PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8260013

Evaluating diagnostic tests.

Abstract

The presentations at this conference will discuss new technologies and rapid scientific developments that have resulted in new diagnostic tests for periodontal disease, musculoskeletal imaging, temporomandibular joint dysfunctions, and incipient coronal and root dental caries. However, for many of these claims, there has been insufficient scientific support regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the tests, or their ability to predict the percent of cases in which the disease or condition progresses to the next state of development. Research is needed that will yield the basic diagnostic parameters of new diagnostic tests, i.e., their accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The purpose and methods for calculating each of these measures are described in this paper. Five questions are then presented that will need to be addressed in future research regarding new diagnostic tests: (1) Does the scientific theory of the test fit with our current body of knowledge? (2) Have the efficacy parameters of the test been reliably determined? (3) How does the test affect clinical decision-making? (4) Does using the test improve the patient's health? and (5) Is the added expense of the test justified by increased effectiveness or by avoiding other health expenditures?

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C W Douglass. 1993. Evaluating diagnostic tests.. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374930070021701

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A problem-based approach to a course in oral diagnosis.

This paper describes the first two years of an attempt to introduce a problem-based approach into the teaching of oral diagnosis. The most significant features of this approach were the involvement of the students in setting course goals, the use of student journals to encourage reflection on learning, the encouragement of self-assessment, and an attempt to relate clinical practice to problem-solving seminars. The paper reports on student reactions to the course and discusses further developments in the course, in particular attempts to develop a more explicit understanding in students of their own learning processes, and more attention to factors in the learning environment which engender confidence, reflection and self-evaluation.

Diagnosis, Oral