PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8278148

Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling.

Abstract

Although chromosomal mosaicism is encountered frequently in CVS, it is most often restricted to the extraembryonic tissues. Counseling before CVS should include a discussion of the frequency and significance of placental mosaicism. Patients seeking information about the procedure need to be aware of the slight but not negligible possibility of the need for additional follow-up studies. Additional studies may involve additional risks with emotional and psychological sequelae. Ultimately, no prenatal procedure or combination of procedures can provide 100% accuracy in excluding mosaicism once the issue has been raised. When the mosaicism is felt to be confined to the placenta, counseling should probably address the potential increased risk for pregnancy complication, such as miscarriage and IUGR, with appropriate follow-up of the pregnancy, especially in the third trimester. Excluding the issue of mosaicism, the predictive value of cytogenetic diagnosis after CVS is equivalent to that of amniocentesis. In addition, CVS provides this information at an earlier time in the pregnancy than does amniocentesis. The majority of patients electing CVS (98% or more) will not have to deal with these complicated issues. It is hoped that an increasing cumulative experience with CVS mosaicism will help differentiate low- from high-risk situations. At the present time, however, there are insufficient and inconsistent data with which to accurately assess the risks associated with placental mosaicism. Most of the available literature concludes that additional, more focused studies, including long-term follow-up, are needed to help elucidate a better understanding of these issues.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J S Fryburg. 1993. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8278148/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia A by chorionic villus sampling and cordocentesis: all India Institute of Medical Science experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We looked at the two most commonly used methods for prenatal diagnosis, cordocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia A in an Indian setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample included 16 families which reported to us for prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia A at All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India. Prenatal tests were done on chorionic villus samples or on cord blood (cordocentesis). Molecular work-up included the use of indirect mutation analysis in the form of linkage markers like CA-13, CA-22, Xba1 and Bcl1 as well as direct mutation analysis in the form of inversion 1 and 22 detection. Non-molecular work-up included primarily factor VIII assays. RESULT: Chorionic villus sampling was performed in eight mothers. Of the other eight mothers, six underwent cord blood factor VIII assays because these had absence of family history and were negative for linkage and inversion 1 and 22. One patient had a female child and another had a fetus that showed congenital abnormalities. CONCLUSION: We found that the choice of either technique, chorionic villus or cordocentesis, is not really an alternative, but rather dependent on the gestational age of presentation.

Chorionic Villi Sampling↗

A familial inverted duplication 2q33-q34 identified and delineated by multiple cytogenetic techniques.

We describe a unique family with two children having a delay in psychomotor development. In both children we identified an interstitial duplication dup(2)(q34q33) using multiple, complementary molecular cytogenetic techniques. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and array-CGH were used to determine the size and the location of the duplicated region, the orientation of the duplicated region was identified with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Both parents demonstrated a normal karyotype and normal CGH and array-CGH-profiles. However, FISH on peripheral blood cells from the mother showed the inv dup(2) in 9% of metaphases and 19% of interphase nuclei. To our knowledge this is the first report of a mosaic carrier of duplication in the long arm of chromosome 2. The finding of chromosomal mosaicism of at least 19% in the mother increases the recurrence risk. The exact characterisation of the inv dup(2) with FISH probes enabled us to offer a reliable prenatal FISH test. Comparison of the clinical features of the two children with those of previously described cases supports the hypothesis that the characteristic facial phenotype is linked to the distal part of the 2q33-q37 region. This report illustrates that in case of two sibs with an identical structural chromosomal abnormality the possibility of parental chromosomal mosaicism must be thoroughly investigated.

Chorionic Villi Sampling↗

Mosaicism for mitochondrial DNA polymorphic variants in placenta has implications for the feasibility of prenatal diagnosis in mtDNA diseases.

Women who have had a child with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disease need to know the risk of recurrence, but this risk is difficult to estimate because mutant and wild-type (normal) mtDNA coexist in the same person (heteroplasmy). The possibility that a single sample may not reflect the whole organism both impedes prenatal diagnosis of most mtDNA diseases, and suggests radical alternative strategies such as nuclear transfer. We used naturally occurring mtDNA variants to investigate mtDNA segregation in placenta. Using large samples of control placenta, we demonstrated that the level of polymorphic heteroplasmic mtDNA variants is very similar in mother, cord blood and placenta. However, where placental samples were very small (< 10 mg) there was clear evidence of variation in the distribution of mtDNA polymorphic variants. We present the first evidence for variation in mutant load, that is, mosaicism for mtDNA polymorphic variants in placenta. This suggests that mtDNA mutants may segregate in placenta and that a single chorionic villous sample (CVS) may be unrepresentative of the whole placenta. Duplicates may be necessary where CVS are small. However, the close correlation of mutant load in maternal, fetal blood and placental mtDNA suggests that the average load in placenta does reflect the load of mutant mtDNA in the baby. Provided that segregation of neutral and pathogenic mtDNA mutants is similar in utero, our results are generally encouraging for developing prenatal diagnosis for mtDNA diseases. Identifying mtDNA segregation in human placenta suggests studies of relevance to placental evolution and to developmental biology.

Chorionic Villi Sampling↗