PubMed · 8283602
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M A Ezad. 1993. Stroke--modern management.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8283602/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: As part of the EU-project ProESOR (Project for the European Standardisation of Outcome Measurement in Rehabilitation), a survey was undertaken to investigate the use of Outcome Measures (OM) within rehabilitation across Europe. This paper presents some of the Danish results of this survey. AIM: Evaluate the extent of use of OMs in rehabilitation. MATERIAL: All 37 Rheumatology/Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation departments and institutions in Denmark. METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to the institutions. This included questions about the institution and its personnel, and nine diagnostic groups: Low back pain, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord lesions, stroke, traumatic brain injury, hip and knee replacement, and lower limb amputees, with estimation of the number of patients treated and the extent of use of OMs. RESULTS: The majority of the departments treated more than 200 in- and out-patients per year. Patients with low back pain and rheumatoid arthritis were the largest patient groups, followed by patients with hip and knee replacement and stroke. OMs were most frequently used with rheumatoid arthritis and, to a lesser extent, patients with low back pain. Although many departments used one or more OM, several did not use any at all. For each diagnostic group more OMs were used if the patient was treated in a department specialised for patients with the particular diagnosis. More OMs were used with patients who tended to have longer inpatient stays. CONCLUSION: There is little consensus regarding which OMs should be used. We recommend that this challenge be taken up.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Diffusion and perfusion MR imaging are now being used increasingly in neuro-vascular clinical applications. While diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging exploits the translational mobility of water molecules to obtain information on the microscopic behaviour of the tissues (presence of macromolecules, presence and permeability of membranes, equilibrium intracellular-extracellular water, ellipsis), perfusion weighted imaging makes use of endogenous and exogenous tracers for monitoring their hemodynamic status. The combination of both techniques is extremely promising for the early detection and assessment of stroke, for tumor characterisation and for the evaluation of neurodegenerative diseases. This article provides a brief review of the basic physics principles underlying the methodologies followed.