PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8285939

Keratometry using the Goldmann tonometer.

M C Corbett·G A Shun-Shin·P N Awdry
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Keratometry using the Goldmann tonometer is a reliable and readily available guide to corneal astigmatism following cataract surgery. In regular corneal astigmatism the Goldmann tonometer rings are distorted into skewed ellipses. The axis of the cylinder can be measured by rotating the tonometer head until an undistorted ellipse is obtained. The power is then assessed by comparison with standard ellipses. The difference in the intracular pressure readings (mmHg) in the two principal meridians was also a good guide to the presence of astigmatism. Goldmann keratometry was performed by a single masked observer in 71 patients 8 weeks after routine extracapsular cataract surgery. This was compared with Javal-Schiotz Keratometry performed by an independent observer. In 83% of patients the axis was measured to within 20 degrees. The 95% confidence interval for the power was +/- 2.90 DC; and 87% of patients would have sutures removed appropriately.

Explore related subjects

AstigmatismCataract ExtractionCorneaHumansSuture TechniquesTonometry, OcularClinical TrialControlled Clinical TrialJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Corbett, G A Shun-Shin, P N Awdry. 1993. Keratometry using the Goldmann tonometer.. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1993.10

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Clinical analysis of steep central islands after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To examine topographic irregularities known as steep central islands that may occur after excimer laser refractive surgery and affect visual acuity. METHODS: We reviewed the computed corneal topographic maps of 35 eyes that had undergone excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy with an excimer laser for compound myopic astigmatism or anisometropic myopia. Steep central islands were defined as areas of steepening of at least 3 diopters and 1.5 mm in diameter. A classification system was developed based on the presence of steep central islands during the postoperative period as follows: class 0, absent; class 1, present at 1 week; class 2, present at 1 month; class 3, present at 3 months. RESULTS: Steep central islands were seen in 25 eyes (71%) at 1 week, 18 eyes (51%) at 1 month, seven eyes (20%) at 3 months, and four eyes (11%) at 6 months. After surgery without nitrogen gas blowing, 16 of 25 patients had class 2 or 3 steep central islands compared with two of 10 eyes when gas blowing was used. Loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 2 Snellen lines or more was seen in eight of 18 eyes with class 2 or 3 steep central islands at 1 month and three of 18 eyes at 3 months. A similar loss occurred in one of 17 eyes with class 0 or 1 steep central islands at 1 month and none of 17 eyes at 3 months. In all eyes with only class 2 steep central islands, loss of at least 1 Snellen line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 1 month was associated with visual restoration at 3 months when the island was no longer present. CONCLUSION: Loss of best spectacle-correlated visual acuity is associated with steep central island formation, and may prolong visual rehabilitation after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

Astigmatism↗
PubMed1996

Corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification and lens implantation through unsutured scleral and corneal tunnel incisions.

PURPOSE: We compared the changes in corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in 93 consecutive eyes with unsutured 4-mm superior scleral tunnel incisions to those through 105 consecutive eyes with unsutured 3.2- to 3.5-mm temporal corneal tunnel incisions. METHODS: Keratometry measurements were obtained preoperatively and at postoperative day 1, week 1, and week 6. Group differences in scalar and vector astigmatism were compared by using analysis of variance methods. RESULTS: Mean scalar astigmatism in the scleral incision group changed from preoperative astigmatism by 0.65 diopter at postoperative day 1, 0.37 diopter at postoperative week 1, and 0.13 diopter at postoperative week 6. Mean scalar astigmatism in the corneal incision group changed from preoperative astigmatism by 0.39 diopter at postoperative astigmatism by 0.39 diopter at postoperative day 1, 0.21 diopter at postoperative week 1, and 0.13 diopter at postoperative week 6. Mean vector astigmatism in the scleral incision group changed 1.26 diopters at 80 degrees at postoperative day 1, 1.05 diopters at 83 degrees at postoperative week 1, and 0.42 diopter at 103 degrees at postoperative week 6. Mean vector astigmatism in the corneal incision group changed 0.77 diopter at 90 degrees at postoperative week 1, and 0.61 diopter at 89 degrees at postoperative week 6. The differences were statistically significant (P = .003) only by vector analysis at the postoperative day 1 examination. CONCLUSIONS: We found significantly greater with-the-rule change in astigmatism in the scleral incision group than in the corneal incision group on the first postoperative day. The effect disappeared by the sixth postoperative week.

Astigmatism↗