PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8290731

Specifying DICOM compliance for modality interfaces.

Abstract

For picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) to be successful, they must be able to acquire image data from imaging devices and integrate this information into a PACS data base. Substantial effort has been invested in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard to define a standard network interface and data model for imaging devices that can facilitate information systems integration. A communication standard cannot ensure multivendor interoperability. Necessary implementation-specific requirements are beyond the scope of a standard but not of a user-generated conformance statement. A DICOM user conformance profile (UCP) is a formal statement drafted by a potential purchaser of medical imaging equipment to state clearly the subset of DICOM functionality that shall be provided by a potential vendor. The UCP specifies the service classes, information objects, and communication protocols to be supported by the implementation. A modality interface UCP presented by the author permits scheduling and demographic information to be communicated to an imaging modality and allows images to be stored in a PACS. The UCP also ensures an unambiguous notification of the end of a study and proper communication of image data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F W Prior. 1993. Specifying DICOM compliance for modality interfaces.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.13.6.8290731

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Legal issues concerning electronic health information: privacy, quality, and liability.

Personally identifiable health information about individuals and general medical information is increasingly available in electronic form in health databases and through online networks. The proliferation of electronic data within the modern health information infrastructure presents significant benefits for medical providers and patients, including enhanced patient autonomy, improved clinical treatment, advances in health research and public health surveillance, and modern security techniques. However, it also presents new legal challenges in 3 interconnected areas: privacy of identifiable health information, reliability and quality of health data, and tortbased liability. Protecting health information privacy (by giving individuals control over health data without severely restricting warranted communal uses) directly improves the quality and reliability of health data (by encouraging individual uses of health services and communal uses of data), which diminishes tort-based liabilities (by reducing instances of medical malpractice or privacy invasions through improvements in the delivery of health care services resulting in part from better quality and reliability of clinical and research data). Following an analysis of the interconnectivity of these 3 areas and discussing existing and proposed health information privacy laws, recommendations for legal reform concerning health information privacy are presented. These include (1) recognizing identifiable health information as highly sensitive, (2) providing privacy safeguards based on fair information practices, (3) empowering patients with information and rights to consent to disclosure (4) limiting disclosures of health data absent consent, (5) incorporating industry-wide security protections, (6) establishing a national data protection authority, and (7) providing a national minimal level of privacy protections.

Computer Communication Networks