PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8313783

Second look in colorectal surgery.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Follow-up should identify metachronous colonic neoplasms and precancers, suture line recurrences, and isolated liver or pulmonary metastases. For some sites of failure the surgical re-resection and multimodal approaches increase disease-free survival and quality of life. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of the different follow-up plans and the carcinoembryonic antigen directed second-look surgery. METHODS: One hundred-sixty patients radically resected for Dukes B or C colorectal cancer were evaluated by a follow-up plan (plasma carcinoembryonic antigen every 2 months; echography every 6 months; chest x-ray every 12 months; and colonoscopy at 1 year and then every 3-5 years). RESULTS: Eighty-nine recurrences were detected (55.6 percent). In 72 recurrences plasma carcinoembryonic antigen elevation was present. Eight carcinoembryonic antigen directed second-look surgeries were performed: in four patients surgical evidence of recurrence was found (two isolated liver metastases were radically resected); two patients with no surgical evidence of recurrence developed a surrenalic isolated metastases and pelvic and hepatic recurrences; two patients had a five-year disease-free survival. In the 17 symptomatic patients with no carcinoembryonic antigen elevation diffuse disease was present, not resectable for cure. Four solitary liver metastases, one metachronous colonic neoplasm, and one suture line recurrence presented a five-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: The authors emphasize that carcinoembryonic antigen-directed second-look surgery is not acceptable for elevated costs. Intensive follow-up plans are superflous, while the monitoring of the carcinoembryonic antigen and instrumental restaging as an indicator of solitary liver metastases and mucosal lesions are very useful.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Bucci, G Benassai, G A Santoro. 1994. Second look in colorectal surgery.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02048444

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The postoperative surveillance of patients who have undergone curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the follow-up practice of colorectal surgeons in the United States. METHODS: A postal survey was sent to 1641 active members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons practicing in the United States to assess the frequency of follow-up and the methods used in the surveillance of asymptomatic patients following curative surgery for CRC. RESULTS: Only 582 (36%) of the questionnaires that were sent were returned fully completed. Of these, 173 surgeons (30%) followed their patients according to guidelines. Ninety-four percent of surgeons during the first year and 81% during the second year saw their patients regularly every 3 or 6 months. The most widely used tests were colonoscopy and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing. There was wide discrepancy in the frequency of follow-up and techniques employed, with only about 50% of surgeons following recommended practice. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance strategies mainly rely on clinical examination, CEA monitoring and colonoscopy. No clear consensus on surveillance programs for CRC patients exists.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗

Colorectal cancer follow-up: useful or useless?

Follow-up of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients is not supported by objectively certain data. Despite the thousands of investigations reported in the scientific literature, only six randomized prospective studies and two meta-analysis of randomized studies provide data suggesting clear conclusions. Our review of the literature revealed that intensive colorectal follow-up should be performed even if the long-term survival benefit is small. The timing and investigations conducted in follow-ups diverge. The inconsistency of follow-ups is revealed by the fact that the leading USA and European societies propose different guidelines. One datum that the literature agrees on is that pancolonoscopy performed at 3-5 year intervals in colorectal cancer surgery patients supports diagnosis of adenomatous polyps and metachronous cancers. Cost analysis have shown that intensive follow-up would certainly exceed the cut-off point level set for every additional year of good quality of life.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗

Antitumor activity of chimeric immunoreceptor gene-modified Tc1 and Th1 cells against autologous carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing colon cancer cells.

To generate tumor-specific and interferon (IFN)-gamma-producing Tc1 and Th1 cells applicable for many cancer patients, we previously developed a protocol for generating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific Tc1 and Th1 cells from healthy human T cells by transduction with a lentivirus containing a chimeric immunoglobulin T-cell receptor (cIgTCR) gene composed of single-chain variable fragments from an anti-CEA-specific monoclonal antibody fused to an intracellular signaling domain of CD28 and CD3zeta. These cells, designated Tc1-T and Th1-T bodies, respectively, showed strong antitumor activity against CEA-expressing tumor cells in RAG2-/- mice when both of them were transferred. However, it remains unclear whether it is possible to generate Tc1-T and Th1-T bodies from cancer patients with defective T-cell function because of significant immunosuppression. Here, we prepared Tc1-T and Th1-T bodies from T cells of a colon cancer patient, and asked whether these T bodies can exert effective T-cell function against autologous tumor cells. These T bodies showed high cytotoxicity and produced IFN-gamma in response to CEA-expressing autologous tumor cells, even in the presence of soluble CEA. It was also demonstrated that Th1-T bodies supported the survival of Tc1-T bodies through cell-to-cell interactions. Furthermore, our protocol utilized retrovirus for cIgTCR transduction to achieve better induction efficiency compared to lentivirus-mediated transduction. Taken together, our findings here indicate that retrovirally transduced Tc1-T and Th1-T bodies will become a promising strategy for adoptive immunotherapy of human cancer.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen↗