PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8329094

Immediate implants: their current status.

Abstract

Immediate implants are implants placed into a prepared extraction socket following tooth removal. Short-term animal and human studies have shown these implants to be comparable to implants placed into healed bone. The advantages of the procedure include fewer surgical sessions, elimination of the waiting period for socket healing, shortened edentulous time period, reduced overall cost, as well as preservation of bone height and width. Although immediate implantation is more demanding both surgically and prosthetically compared to the conventional placement technique, the advantages make it very appealing to patients who are in need of both extractions and implant therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Barzilay. Immediate implants: their current status.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8329094/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Periodontal tissue regeneration in beagle dogs after laser therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Class III periodontal furcations still represent a challenge for the periodontist. Aim of this study was to test the effect of CO2 laser on the treatment of class III furcation defects. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHOD: Class III furcation defects 3 mm deep were surgically induced on mandibular premolars on six male Beagle dogs, for a total of 36 defects. After 6-8 weeks of plaque accumulation, the mean depth was 6.8 mm. Quadrants were randomly assigned to a) CO2 laser therapy (laser), b) Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) procedure using Gore-Tex Membranes, (Gore Tex, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA) and c) Scaling and Root planing (Sc/Rp). CO2 laser beam (El.En, Florence, Italy) was applied to the root surfaces in defocused pulsed mode at 2W, 1 Hz and a duty cycle of 6%, and on periodontal soft tissues at 13W, 40 Hz, and a duty cycle of 40%. Control quadrants received either GTR procedure or Sc/Rp. Mechanical oral hygiene was provided. At 6 months the animals were sacrificed. RESULTS: The laser group showed new attachment formation averaging 1.9 mm (sd +/- 0.5), whereas GTR and Sc/Rp showed 0.2 mm (sd +/- 0.4) and 0.2 mm (sd +/- 0.5) respectively, being the differences statistically significant between the laser group and both GTR and Sc/Rp groups (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: CO2 laser treatment of class III furcation induced formation of new periodontal ligament, cementum and bone.

Alveolar Bone Loss

Flexible (Polyactive) versus rigid (hydroxyapatite) dental implants.

In a beagle dog study, the peri-implant bone changes around flexible (Polyactive) and rigid hydroxyapatite (HA) implants were investigated radiographically by quantitative digital subtraction analysis and by assessment of marginal bone height, with the aid of a computerized method. A loss of approximately 1 mm of marginal bone height was observed for both the dense Polyactive and the HA implants, after 6 months of loading. This value appeared to be stable from 12 weeks of loading onward. Along the total length of the implant during the first 6 weeks of loading, both the flexible (dense Polyactive) and the rigid (HA) implants showed a decrease in density. However, after this 6-week period, the bone density around the implants increased, and after 18 weeks the original bone density was reached. The flexible Polyactive implants provoked less decrease in density than the rigid HA implants, although not to a statistically significant level. This finding sustains the hypothesis that flexible implant materials may transfer stresses to the surrounding bone more favorably.

Alveolar Bone Loss