PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8329584

Brain self-organization dynamics.

Abstract

During early phases of brain development gene expression and postranslational modifications of gene expression are controlled by biochemical signals which are produced in a cellular microenvironment. Later in brain development there is a difference from the development of other organs because electrical signals are added to biochemical messengers as a further signaling in the self-organizing between genes and their respective environments. It must be considered that these electrical signals are capable in influencing gene expression and postranslational modifications. Electrical signals are transported by neuronal processes over distances and with highly topological selectively. This enlarges the range and complexity of the "environment" available to self-organization process. The "environment" relevant to brain self-organization includes all domains with which the evolving brain is capable to interact and from which it receives messages. The same electrical signals which convey messages are used by the brain as information carriers for computational process. The key concept in theories and modeling is that of refference. Cyclical process of emergent goal seeking, refference and sensory feedback constitute the basis for a subject consciousness. This cycle suggest further "inference" that the physiological basis of cause and effect lies in the mechanism of reafference. This tract results in the replacement of sensory stimuli by self-organization activity patterns that are contingent on past experience, present motivational state and expectancy of the future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C C Turbes. 1993. Brain self-organization dynamics.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8329584/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Lactation reduces Fos induction in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus after urethane administration in rats.

Both neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to stressors are reduced in lactating animals. In these studies we determined whether Fos induction following treatment with urethane would differ between nonlactating and lactating rats. Urethane treatment produced robust Fos expression in the central nucleus of the amygdala and the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus 1 h after treatment. Fos expression in both the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei was attenuated in lactating rats compared to that seen in nonlactating animals but Fos expression in the central nucleus of the amygdala did not differ between these two groups. Removing litters from lactating rats 48 h prior to urethane administration restored the Fos response in the parvocellular division of the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) to the level seen in nonlactating rats.

Amygdala

Central amygdala Fos expression during hypotensive or febrile, nonhypotensive endotoxemia in conscious rats.

The distribution and time course of Fos expression in neurons in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) were studied in endotoxemic rats in two separate experiments. In each case, the severity of the endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide; LPS) challenge was characterized by using physiological outcome variables, including blood pressure and heart rate. Throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the CeA, extensive Fos staining was found 3 hours after injection with a hypotensive dose of Salmonella enteritidis LPS. Hypotension alone has been reported to induce Fos in the CeA; therefore, the remaining experiments were performed by using a lower dose of Escherichia coli LPS that did not cause hypotension. The nonhypotensive dose of E. coli LPS also induced Fos in large numbers of neurons of the CeA, with peak staining at 2 hours and Fos staining persisting for 6 hours after LPS injection. Tachycardia and fever after LPS also persisted for at least 6 hours. CeA Fos staining during nonhypotensive endotoxemia was predominantly located in the lateral subnucleus, although Fos-stained medial sub-nucleus neurons were also present. Additional forebrain regions that showed persistent Fos staining 6 hours after LPS included the parvocellular paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and the medial preoptic area. Forebrain regions that contained Fos-stained nuclei at earlier time points, but not at 6 hours, included the supraoptic nucleus, magnocellular regions of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, the subfornical organ, and the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis. Few CeA neurons showed Fos staining in rats that were restrained in a ventilated plastic tube. Neurons in the lateral septal nucleus and the medial amygdaloid nucleus, which have numerous Fos-stained nuclei after stressors such as footshock or restraint, did not show Fos staining above control levels after LPS administration. Activation of CeA neurons after intravenous LPS may indicate persistent drive from vagal afferents and may implicate the CeA in the autonomic, neuroendocrine, and/or behavioral responses to this treatment.

Amygdala