PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8346049

Collaborative interdisciplinary bioethical decision making in intensive care units.

Abstract

There is strong support in the literature for involvement of nurses with patients and physicians in bioethical decision making about patient care. There are indications that nurses and physicians have different beliefs about decisions made and about the decision-making processes, such as who should be involved and what factors should influence such decisions. The literature also demonstrates that nurses often disagree with physicians or are not involved in ethical decision making or both. Interdisciplinary collaboration has been proposed to improve decision making and recommended for health care giving generally. There is research support for the benefit of collaboration in care giving. Ethical principles also support collaborative decision making, involving nurses, as well as physicians, patients, and family. With collaboration there is sharing of information and perspectives, respect for patient and family autonomy, and disclosure. More studies of interdisciplinary bioethical decision making are needed, measuring both professions' perceptions of their roles in ethical decision making, as well as examining the effects of collaboration on care outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J G Baggs. Collaborative interdisciplinary bioethical decision making in intensive care units.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8346049/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗