PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8364995

Arthroscopic microdiscectomy versus nucleotomy techniques.

Abstract

Arthroscopic microdiscectomy represents an alternative method of treatment for herniated lumbar disc and its associated radiculopathy. In contrast to nucleotomy procedures that allow for only central evacuation of the nuclear mass, in arthroscopic microdiscectomy, the emphasis is placed on evacuation of the posterior collagenized fragments, which are responsible for mechanical compression of the nerve roots. Over a period of 10 years, 250 patients with unremitting sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus have been treated at the Graduate Hospital through a posterolateral approach via a 6.5-mm cannula. Our overall successful results have been 87.5%, and we have not encountered any neurovascular or other serious complications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Kambin, L F Cohen. 1993. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy versus nucleotomy techniques.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8364995/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Indications and techniques for wrist arthroscopy].

After considering the anatomy of the wrist, the technical requirements for wrist arthroscopy are discussed. This method is used as an additional diagnostic procedure and staging procedure as well as a therapeutic technique. Complications, which are rare, most commonly involve nerve irritation, damage to cutaneous nerves and extensor tendons. Lose bodies can be removed arthroscopically, however, arthroscopically assisted fracture treatment or the removal of ganglions are uncommon. Approaches are lateral and oriented on the extensor tendons or other anatomical landmarks. Arthroscopy is especially useful by carpal instability as it offers many possibilities, not only diagnostically but also therapeutically.

Arthroscopes↗

[Percutaneous perforation of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures to avoid cartilaginous damage due to arthroscopic intervention at the medial meniscal posterior horn in narrow joints].

THE PROBLEM: Irreversible cartilaginous damage to the femur and tibia due to resection and suture instruments in arthroscopic surgery at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in narrow knee joints or in the presence of contracted medial capsuloligamentous structures. THE SOLUTION: Enlargement of the medial joint space by repeated percutaneous perforation of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures under consistently applied valgus stress. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: With the knee joint almost in full extension and with simultaneous, uniformly applied valgus stress, repeated percutaneous perforation of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures with a sharp-tipped cannula until perceptible enlargement of the medial joint compartment is achieved. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AND RESULT: Uneventful healing of the posteromedial capsuloligamentous structures without the need for any special postoperative treatments.

Arthroscopes↗