PubMed · 8365733
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
V S Banka, P S Fail, G S Kochar. Newer interventional devices.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8365733/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The perivascular implantation of tissue-engineered endothelial cells around injured arteries offers an opportunity to study fundamental vascular physiology as well as restore and improve tissue function. Cell source is an important issue because the ability to implant either xenogeneic or allogeneic cells would greatly enhance the clinical applications of tissue-engineered grafts. We investigated the biological and immunological responses to endothelial cell xenografts and allografts in pigs 4 weeks after angioplasty of the carotid arteries. Porcine or bovine aortic endothelial cells were cultured within Gelfoam matrices and implanted in the perivascular space of 42 injured arteries. Both porcine and bovine endothelial cell grafts reduced the restenosis index compared with control by 54% and 46%, respectively. Perivascular heparin release devices, formulated to release heparin at twice the rate of release of heparan sulfate proteoglycan from endothelial cell implants, produced no significant reduction in the restenosis index. Endothelial cell implants also reduced occlusive thrombosis compared with control and heparin release devices. Host immune responses to endothelial implants were investigated by immunohistochemical examination of explanted devices and by immunocytochemistry of serum samples. The bovine cell grafts displayed infiltration of leukocytes, consisting primarily of lymphocytes, and caused an increase in antibodies detected in serum samples. Reduced cellular infiltration and no humoral response were detected in animals that received allografts. Despite the difference in immune response, the biological effects of xenografts or allografts did not differ significantly.
Revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia is an infrequent vascular procedure whose objective long-term patency results have been described in relatively few patients. We reviewed our experience with such procedures and report on the objective and symptomatic long-term results. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 42 patients who underwent mesenteric arterial reconstruction of 66 vessels during an 11-year period from 1986 to 1997. All patients were treated for symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia. The results support the clinical efficacy and durability of visceral artery bypass procedures for patients with symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia. Patency rates for females were better than for males independent of graft type.
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of arteriopathy of the lower limbs (ALL) with vasoactive drugs must follow French health laws recently introduced in regard to the prescription of unuseful drugs and treatments and the frequency at which some patients resort to specific drugs and treatments. Prescription of vasoactive drugs in ALL requires the existence of functional discomfort. Prescription of only one vasoactive drug is sufficient. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Results of published clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of vasoactive drugs for the relief of claudication related to arteriopathy. To conform to the rules of the European Drug Agency, treatment with vasoactive drugs which improve the walking distance is recommended as "symptomatic treatment of arterial claudication in ALL". Iloprost is only used in the treatment of permanent ischemia. Prescription of vasoactive drugs is part of a scheme of therapeutic indications that are well known and rigorous. Rules of hygiene and reduction of risk factors are the essential preliminary elements. In the case of arterial claudication due to femoral or distal obliteration, chemical medication is suggested, whereas in the case of iliac lesion, angioplasty should be considered. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Walking is recommended in all the cases; however, usually less than a quarter of all patients will conform to this recommendation. Vasoactive drugs thus find their place in the therapeutic scheme. Evaluation of the efficiency of vasoactive drugs rises above simple measures of the walking distance, rather integrating quality of life and usefulness of the treatment.