PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8367329

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Past, present, and future.

Abstract

The MRSA control program at UCDMC is one of many approaches used in hospitals today. With this less restrictive program, we have been able to maintain control of MRSA for approximately 5 years. By establishing a threshold for investigation at four new nosocomial cases per month, the ICD has been able to maintain a manageable endemic level of MRSA. Figure 2 shows the downward trend of new cases of MRSA per fiscal year. During 1991, however, we experienced clustering of cases in two areas of the hospital along with a major outbreak in our burn unit. This is reflected in the significant rise in the number of new cases for that year. Even with these outbreaks, however, we have been able to re-establish control. Figure 3 represents the number of new MRSA cases per month during fiscal year 1991. After the peak in April, we have again seen a downward trend, with an average of four new cases per month during the first quarter of fiscal year 1992. The success of this program is attributed to the cooperation and excellent communication among the hospital departments who are active participants in this control program. It is also owing to the establishment of a very active antibiotic control program that discourages inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents. This team effort is critical to the success of any infection control program. Infection control protocols are constantly changing, even if they are directed toward the same pathogen. Hospital epidemiology provides us with a very systematic approach to controlling the spread of disease. During the process, however, we are constantly collecting new information about the pathogen, allowing us to re-evaluate and, we hope, improve our approach to control. This is one reason for the numerous approaches to control found in the vast array of MRSA literature. MRSA continues to be a challenge of the 1990s. It appears to be an increasing problem in US hospitals, regardless of hospital size. Although its elusive behavior evades the most comprehensive and carefully planned control programs of even the most skilled hospital epidemiologists, hospitals continue to struggle for control of this organism. The alternative to control is probable resistance to vancomycin, which would have devastating public health consequences, particularly as alternative antibiotic therapy is not yet available.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M M Morita. 1993. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Past, present, and future.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8367329/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Prevention and control of the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: results of a workshop held by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology].

The incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), especially E. faecium, is increasing in several German hospitals and some facilities have experienced VRE outbreaks. The German National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System has also noticed a sharp increase in the incidence of nosocomial VRE infections per 10,000 patients from 0.5 in 2003 to 11.0 in 2005 accompanied by a rise in VRE-associated mortality. However, the reasons of this increase remain unknown. As VRE may cause severe nosocomial infections, transmission must be restricted. This article provides the guidelines as defined by the workshop of the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology for the prevention of VRE transmission in both, endemic and epidemic, settings. The following topics are discussed: indication for VRE screening, microbiological diagnostics, general infection control measures (isolation precautions and use of protective clothing) and additional hygiene measures in the nosocomial VRE outbreak setting.

Cross Infection↗