PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8375605

How to succeed in a multipractice study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In designing a multipractice study on the prescribing habits of general practitioners (GPs) in a Norwegian county, we took into account positive and negative experiences from earlier research on how to improve participation and retention of physician investigators. METHODS: The GP recruitment took place in two phases. The first step was to establish a local network and a sense of community among GPs in the county. The second step consisted of a personal visit by the project leader to all of the practices in the county during the three months before the study started. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine (96%) of a total of 156 GPs participated during the first one-month data collection period, registering 43,619 patient contacts. Only six GPs refused to participate, and one GP could not participate because of illness. During the second data collection period, four of the original nonparticipants asked to join, which gave a rate of enrollment of 98% (153 of 156). This time 46,839 contacts with patients were registered. None of the participants dropped out of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our design for achieving high recruitment and participation rates was successful. We found that in conducting multipractice studies it was essential to spend enough time and resources on establishing a close collaborative relationship with GPs before, during, and after the study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Rokstad, P Fugelli. How to succeed in a multipractice study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8375605/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗