PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8379797

Thoracoscopy training in a residency program.

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VAT) is rapidly gaining application in a variety of thoracic surgical procedures. As a result, fellowship programs in thoracic surgery need to provide training in VAT techniques. Instruction should include emphasis on aspects of the open procedures, including the anatomic relationships as seen through an open thoracotomy and on cross-sectional imaging techniques. Standardization of the indications for VAT, as well as emphasis on the basic principles of visualization and operative manipulation, will serve to reinforce the advantages and limitations inherent to VAT. An initial exposure to VAT in a nonclinical context, including didactic instruction in the instrumentation and skills, review of videotapes, and animate or inanimate laboratory instruction, provides a controlled setting for learning the fundamentals. Interactive assistance with clinical VAT procedures should be encouraged once the basic principles are learned. Ultimately, guidelines and qualifications for performing VAT procedures should be incorporated into the requirements for thoracic surgical training programs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Wain. 1993. Thoracoscopy training in a residency program.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90984-p

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The nature of after-hours telephone medical practice by GI fellows.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroenterology fellows on-call often serve as the initial or only contact for patients calling "after hours" with questions and symptoms. These fellows are rarely trained specifically in how to handle these calls. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are particular topics in telephone medicine that ought to be covered in new fellow training. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the nature of after-hours pages initiated by patients and to document the advice given by fellows. METHODS: The content of 100 patient-initiated telephone calls with GI fellows was recorded prospectively over 7 months. We included pages received between 5 PM and 8 AM daily as well as daytime calls on weekends. Fellows documented the time and length of the call, the issue raised by the patient, the advice given, and the patient's gender and attending gastroenterologist. When a particular patient paged more than once in a 24-h period, the repeat calls were not counted toward the 100-call tally. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of calls occurred between 11 PM and 7 AM. Eighty-three percent of calls lasted less than 10 min. Sixty-seven percent of patients called because of symptoms. Only 30% of patients calling with symptoms were referred to the emergency room. Although only 1 of 13 patients with procedure-related (i.e., postendoscopy) symptoms required admission to the hospital, 18 of 54 (33%) patients with nonprocedure-related symptoms required admission either immediately or within a month of calling after hours. CONCLUSIONS: Most after-hours calls from patients are related to symptoms. Patients calling with postprocedure symptoms rarely require admission to the hospital. Conversely, a significant number of patients calling with non-procedure-related symptoms require admission within 30 days. Fellowship directors should consider providing training to fellows in the evaluation of symptoms over the telephone.

Fellowships and Scholarships↗