PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8401708

Mapping care.

Abstract

Managing clinical quality and assessing the efficacy of clinical operations are key objectives for all health care providers--but pressure is growing to do more with fewer resources. As a result, many innovators are turning to critical paths as a tool that can help them achieve those goals. Indeed, a new survey by Hospitals & Health Networks and Medicus Systems Corp. finds critical paths are taking hold in health care organizations in a big way. Of those hospital executives surveyed, 57 percent say they have a critical paths program. But the survey also uncovered a slew of names for the tools being used, and experts agree there are wide disparities in innovators' motivations, methods and achievements.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Lumsdon, M Hagland. 1993-10-20. Mapping care.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8401708/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A cost analysis of a treatment policy of a deliberate perioperative increase in oxygen delivery in high risk surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost implications of a treatment policy of a deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery in high risk surgical patients. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 'protocol' high risk surgical patients in whom oxygen delivery was specifically targeted towards 600 ml/min/m2 with 'control' patients. INTERVENTIONS: In a randomised, controlled clinical trial we previously demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality (5.7% vs 22.2%, p = 0.015) and morbidity (0.68 +/- 0.16 complications vs 1.35 +/- 0.20, p = 0.008) in 'protocol' high risk surgical patients in whom oxygen delivery was specifically targeted towards 600 ml/min per m2 compared with 'control' patients. This current study retrospectively analysed the medical care and National Health Service resource use of each patient in the trial. Departmental purchasing records and business managers were consulted to identify the unit cost of these resources, and thereby the cost of treating each patient was calculated. RESULTS: The median cost of treating a protocol patient was lower than for a control patient (6,525 pounds vs 7,784 pounds) and this reduction was due mainly to a decrease in the cost of treating postoperative complications (median 213 pounds vs 668 pounds). The cost of obtaining a survivor was 31% lower in the protocol group. CONCLUSION: Perioperative increase of oxygen delivery in high risk surgical patients not only improves survival, but also provides an actual and relative cost saving. This may have important implications for the management of these patients and the funding of intensive care.

Clinical Protocols