PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8424146

[Clarity in general practice].

Abstract

A random sample of 224 consultations and interviews was analyzed, regarding the structuring and sequences in each consultation. Most space in the unbiased doctor's descriptions took anamnesis, followed by therapy, investigation, followed by physical examination and, least, diagnosis. Urban doctors kept the classic scheme of succeeding anamnesis, investigation, diagnosis and therapy more often than their rural colleagues. Explanations to patients were more frequently done by country doctors. The words doctors used to indicate communication are listed. The term of resonance phase in consultation is discussed. To achieve clarity in the consultation is important for doctor's stress prophylaxis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Blum. 1993-01-19. [Clarity in general practice].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8424146/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗