PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8435913

Wound dressing.

Abstract

Dressings are applications for wounds, burns, and ulcers. Dressings should be regarded as supportive of healing; they are desirable but not essential in an emergency. This article reviews measurement of wound healing and the functions of wound dressings. A variety of dressings and their respective advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T J Ryan. 1993. Wound dressing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8435913/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The use of adhesive metal-ceramic restorations as an alternative to conventional crown and bridge materials.

A compromise is often necessary when choosing the most appropriate material in the construction of crowns and bridges. The most commonly used material is porcelain fused to metal since it is aesthetic and has acceptable physical characteristics to be used in the restoration of both anterior and posterior teeth. Unfortunately, to achieve a predictable and durable result extensive tooth preparation is invariably necessary. More conservative alternatives such as dentine-bonded crowns may have inferior physical characteristics and allow less predictable control over the occlusal contour. This paper describes the construction of fixed restorations which use both lost wax and refractory die techniques in their construction. This results in a restoration which has the combined advantages of both traditional porcelain fused to metal and dentine-bonded crowns and bridges.

Adhesiveness

Strongyloides venezuelensis: adhesion of adult worms to culture vessels by orally secreted mucosubstances.

Adults worms of Strongyloides venezuelensis were cultured in vitro. After overnight incubation, about 60% of the worms adhered firmly to the bottom of culture vessels by secreting adhesive substances from the mouth. A single worm produced 24.5 +/- 10.1 of the adhesion spots overnight. When they were transferred to new culture vessels, they still produced new spots comparable to those produced for first 24 hr. The adhesion spots were positively stained with Coomassie brilliant blue and also with mucicarmine, periodic acid-Schiff, and alcian blue, pH 2.5, but not with alcian blue, pH 0.3, indicating their glycoprotein nature. The substances were amorphous and did not contain cells or nuclei. Histologic staining with a panel of lectins showed that the adhesive substances were rich in mannose, N-acetyl galactosamine, and N-acetyl glucosamine, but devoid of sialic acid. These characteristics were distinct from those of jejunal goblet cell mucins of rats. Adhesive substances contained antigenic components recognized by sera from infected rats. Thus, the adhesive substances secreted from the mouth of S. venezuelensis were clearly of parasite origin. We consider the production/secretion of the adhesive substances by S. venezuelensis adult worms a key step for the parasites to invade and establish the host epithelial layer.

Adhesiveness

Atomic force microscope imaging contrast based on molecular recognition.

The contrast in atomic force microscope images arises from forces between the tip and the sample. It was shown recently that specific molecular interaction forces may be measured with the atomic force microscope; consequently, we use such forces to map the distribution of binding partners on samples. Here we demonstrate this concept by imaging a streptavidin pattern with a biotinylated tip in a novel imaging mode called affinity imaging. In this mode topography, adhesion, and sample elasticity are extracted online from local force scans. We show that this technique allows the separation of these values and that the measured binding pattern is based on specific molecular interactions.

Adhesiveness