PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8442815

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an anatomic study.

H J Levy·T B Soifer·F A Kleinbart·L J Lemak·E Bryk
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been shown to decrease postoperative recovery time in patients undergoing surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. There is, however, some controversy concerning the safety and reliability of the procedure. We performed endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilizing the two portal technique described by Chow on 20 fresh cadaver specimens. There were no injuries noted in any of the vital structures including the ulnar artery, superficial palmar arch, third common digital nerve or flexor tendons. The transverse carpal ligament was found to be completely transected in 95% of the specimens. Hyperextension of the wrist significantly displaces the vital structures both dorsally and distally. The use of a slotted cannula and specially designed blades protect the surrounding structures during the procedure. Based on this study, endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the technique described by Chow may be performed reliably without injury to any of the vital structures.

Explore related subjects

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeEndoscopyHumansWrist JointJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H J Levy, T B Soifer, F A Kleinbart, L J Lemak, E Bryk. 1993. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an anatomic study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80334-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A pilot study comparing two manual therapy interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of manual therapy interventions for relieving the signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by comparing 2 forms of manual therapy techniques: Graston Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (GISTM) and STM administered with the clinician hands. METHODS: The study was a prospective comparative research design in the setting of a research laboratory. Volunteers were recruited with symptoms suggestive of CTS based upon a phone interview and confirmed by electrodiagnostic study findings, symptom characteristics, and physical examination findings during an initial screening visit. Eligible patients with CTS were randomly allocated to receive either GISTM or STM. Interventions were, on average, twice a week for 4 weeks and once a week for 2 additional weeks. Outcome measures included (1) sensory and motor nerve conduction evaluations of the median nerve; (2) subjective pain evaluations of the hand using visual analog scales and Katz hand diagrams; (3) self-reported ratings of symptom severity and functional status; and (4) clinical assessments of sensory and motor functions of the hand via physical examination procedures. Parametric and nonparametric statistics compared treated CTS hand and control hand and between the treatment interventions, across time (baseline, immediate post, and at 3 months' follow-up). RESULTS: After both manual therapy interventions, there were improvements to nerve conduction latencies, wrist strength, and wrist motion. The improvements detected by our subjective evaluations of the signs and symptoms of CTS and patient satisfaction with the treatment outcomes provided additional evidence for the clinical efficacy of these 2 manual therapies for CTS. The improvements were maintained at 3 months for both treatment interventions. Data from the control hand did not change across measurement time points. CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical improvements were not different between the 2 manual therapy techniques, which were compared prospectively, the data substantiated the clinical efficacy of conservative treatment options for mild to moderate CTS.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome↗
PubMed2006

Finger flexor motor control patterns during active flexion: an in vivo tendon force study.

An in vivo tendon force measurement system was used to evaluate index finger flexor motor control patterns during active finger flexion. During open carpal tunnel release surgery (N=12) the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum superficilias (FDS) tendons were instrumented with buckle force transducers and participants performed finger flexion at two different wrist angles (0 degrees or 30 degrees ). During finger flexion, there was concurrent change of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint angles, but the FDP and FDS tendon force changes were not concurrent. For the FDS tendon, no consistent changes in force were observed across participants at either wrist angle. For the FDP tendon, there were two force patterns. With the wrist in a neutral posture, the movement was initiated without force from the finger flexors, and further flexion (after the first 0.5s) was carried out with force from the FDP. With the wrist in a flexed posture, the motion was generally both initiated and continued using FDP force. At some wrist postures, finger flexion was initiated by passive forces which were replaced by FDP force to complete the motion.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome↗