PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8447996

Esophagogastrectomy.

Abstract

The diagnosis of esophageal cancer continues to stimulate much research to find the most effective methods of treatment. Combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy may produce results as good as if not better than those with operation plus radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Esophagogastrectomy is performed using any one of several surgical approaches. The individual status of the patient is an important determinant when selecting the surgical approach. There is no clear evidence that one approach is superior to another. Patients should be evaluated appropriately and prepared for operation so that they have the best chance for having a benign postoperative course. Postoperative nursing management requires complex assessment and intervention skills. The optimal approach to the management of esophageal cancer has yet to be defined. Esophagogastrectomy remains primarily a palliative, not curative, approach to patient management. The prevention of postoperative complications through astute assessment and intervention will improve the quality of patient outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Sideranko. 1993. Esophagogastrectomy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8447996/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Experience of post-pyloric feeding in seriously ill patients in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining nutrition is an integral part of patient care and when it is possible enteral nutrition is regarded as superior to parenteral nutrition. Post-pyloric feeding may enable enteral feeding to be maintained in patients who cannot tolerate nasogastric feeding. The success of post-pyloric feeding in routine clinical practice is uncertain. METHODS: One hundred and forty six consecutive patients who had 150 separate episodes of post-pyloric feeding were identified. Casenotes were reviewed to assess indication for post-pyloric feeding, prior use of alternative methods of feeding, success of achieving nutritional requirements and patient outcome. RESULTS: A post-pyloric tube was successfully placed in 138 (92%) and nutritional requirements were met by post-pyloric feeding alone in 124 (83%). Post-pyloric feeding was used for between 2 and 254 days (median 14 days). Conditions for which post-pyloric feeding was used to administer nutritional support included burn injury, pancreatitis, sepsis, post-operative gastric stasis, bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy induced vomiting. Fifty (33%) patients had an attempt at nasogastric feeding and 33 (22%) were on total parenteral nutrition before post-pyloric feeding was commenced. There was one major complication of a jejunal ulcer bleed in the series. Minor complications included displacement of the nasojejunal tube and failure to absorb feed related to gastrointestinal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Post-pyloric feeding can be successfully used to maintain enteral nutrition in patients who would otherwise require parenteral nutrition.

Critical Illness↗

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill.

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is endemic within many hospitals worldwide. Critically ill patients on intensive care units have increased risk factors making them especially prone to nosocomially acquired infections. This review addresses the current situation regarding the evolution of MRSA and the techniques for identifying and epidemiologically typing it. It discusses specific risk factors, the morbidity and mortality associated with critically ill patients, and possibilities for future antibiotic treatments.

Critical Illness↗