Wrist arthrography.

S G Fransson

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8452713

Wrist arthrography.

S G Fransson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The ligaments of the proximal row of carpal bones and the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) strongly influence the function and stability of the wrist. Injury to the ligaments may result in chronic wrist pain or instability. Wrist arthrography is valuable in the investigation of such damage when surgical intervention is considered and plain radiography is unrewarding. There are also several technical modifications of the standard radiocarpal arthrography available. Owing to the possibility of congenital perforations and degenerative changes in these ligaments the arthrographic findings should be related to the clinical signs and the age of the patient. CT has less diagnostic importance in this respect while MR imaging is an alternative and may become the method of choice. Both these methods have great potential in the evaluation of soft tissues of the wrist other than the TFC.

Explore related subjects

Arthrography Contrast Media Humans Wrist Injuries Wrist Joint Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S G Fransson. 1993. Wrist arthrography.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8452713/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Total shoulder arthroplasty -- current problems and possible solutions.

The concept and design of a cemented unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), introduced by Charles Neer II 25 years ago, has been successful in the management of degenerative and inflammatory conditions of the shoulder, controlling pain and, in many patients, significantly improving function. The clinical outcome is very much determined by the nature and severity of the pathology, as well as by the surgeon's experience and ability to correctly locate and fix the components. Total shoulder arthroplasty is a technically difficult procedure with perhaps a greater potential for technical errors and complications compared with other commonly performed arthroplasties. Current systems are modular on the humeral side, with varying head diameters and neck lengths, allowing more accurate coverage of the cut surface of the humeral neck and improved ability to establish the position of the joint line within the requirements of correct soft tissue tension and balance. Cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components remain the most favored, but the majority now have an increased radius of curvature compared with their corresponding humeral head, to allow translation during movement. Aseptic glenoid component loosening is the most frequently encountered long-term complication and is hastened by conforming prostheses, incorrect positioning, rotator cuff tears, and capsular contractures, but is protected by secure glenoid fixation. Cemented one-piece metal-backed glenoids have been disappointing, but non-cemented glenoids are being trialed with promising early results, although they have introduced their own particular problems of rapid polyethylene wear and component dissociation. Although cemented humeral components have a very low incidence of symptomatic loosening, most surgeons currently use press-fit designs supplemented with metaphyseal porous coating for osseous integration. Based on increased understanding of the morphology of the upper humerus, current designs are evolving with increased modularity, allowing the surgeon to choose the appropriate size, inclination, offset and version of the humeral component. These changes will, it is hoped, result in improved functional recovery and increased survivorship of the glenoid component.

Arthrography↗

PubMed1999

Time dependence of iopamidol and iodixanol in arthrography of the knee.

PURPOSE: The safety and diagnostic efficacy of iodixanol (Visipaque) 270 mg I/ml was compared to that of iopamidol (Iopamiron) 300 mg I/ml in knee arthrography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This trial was a bi-center double-blind trial including 128 patients (iodixanol/iopamidol 64/64 patients). Efficacy was evaluated by blinded grading of the diagnostic quality of the p.a. images taken 0, 12 and 25 min after contrast administration by the examining radiologist and later at a consensus evaluation by two experienced skeletal radiologists. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: No patient experienced any adverse event. The proportion of better images at both 12 and 25 min after injection was higher in the iodixanol group compared to the iopamidol group both by the examining radiologist and at the consensus evaluation. CONCLUSION: In the knee joint iodixanol is a safe contrast medium. The contrast effect of iodixanol lasted longer than that of iopamidol, which can be important when performing arthrography, especially CT arthrography, where the time between puncture and examination can be prolonged.

Arthrography↗

PubMed1998

Assessment of lumbosacral fusion mass by angled radiography. Technical notes.

STUDY DESIGN: Lumbosacral fusion masses were assessed by angled radiography. OBJECTIVES: To introduce the use of the angled anteroposterior radiograph in the evaluation of the fusion mass at the lumbosacral region. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Determination of the presence and progress of the fusion mass at the lumbosacral junction may be difficult clinically and radiologically. Few studies regarding the use of the angled anteroposterior view of plain radiographs in evaluating L5-S1 fusion are available. METHODS: The patient was placed in the supine position, and an angled view of the lumbosacral junction was obtained. Radiography of the angled anteroposterior view was performed with the x-ray beam oriented toward the cranial portion at 50 degrees to 55 degrees relative to the x-ray table. RESULTS: The use of the angled view of the lumbosacral junction eliminates the superimposition of the L5 transverse process on the posterior part of the superior ala of the sacrum, widens the L5-S1 intertransverse space, and enhances direct visualization. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the angled anteroposterior view on plain radiographs is recommended in the evaluation of the fusion status at L5-S1.

Arthrography↗