PubMed · 845643
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H Bantli. 1977. Cerebellocerebral pathways.. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1977.46.4.0559
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The activity of single myelinated afferents was recorded from dorsal roots L4-5 in normal Sprague-Dawley rats and animals that developed mechanical hypersensitivity following ischemic injury to the sciatic nerve. The mechanical response properties and conduction velocity of afferents conducting through the injury site (about 50% of units) were similar to controls. However, the majority of afferents not conducting through the injury site exhibited ongoing activity. The results suggest that mechanical allodynia may be at least partly due to the central integration of activity arising from these two populations of afferents in neuropathic rats.
The aim of this study was to elucidate the neuronal pathways mediating propriospinal reflexes of the tail with special reference to the intersegmental connections between group I muscle afferents and motoneurons. Experiments were performed on 25 unanesthetized, spinalized (L1) cats of both sexes. The effects of electrical stimulation of the afferents embedded in different levels of the following muscles: m. extensor caudae medialis (ECM), m. extensor caudae lateralis (ECL), m. flexor caudae longus (FCL), and m. flexor caudae brevis (FCB), were observed in tail motoneurons in the first or second coccygeal (Co1 or Co2) spinal segment. Stimulation of group I muscle afferents from the cranial parts of the tail muscles produced predominantly excitatory postsynaptic potentials. In ECM and FCB, some motoneurons had significant excitatory effects exerted by group I afferent inputs from homonymous and/or synergistic muscles during vertical tail movement, and some motoneurons had predominately excitatory effects from antagonistic muscles during vertical tail movement. Excitatory effects in ECL and FCL motoneurons occurred more often and were larger in size after stimulating the ipsilateral tail muscles than after stimulating the contralateral tail muscles. The stimulation of group I muscle afferents from the caudal parts of the tail muscles produced predominantly inhibitory effects. The shortest neuronal pathways for excitatory postsynaptic potentials and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials were mono- and disynaptic neuronal pathways, respectively. The results of the present experiments suggest that continuous tail movements along the tail are performed by group I reflex pathways.
A large body of evidence derived from electrophysiological recording and pharmacological/behavioral experiments suggests the presence of CCKA-receptors on vagal primary afferent fibers innervating the gastrointestinal tract. With the availability of antibodies specific for the CCKA-receptor, we wanted to demonstrate its presence and distribution on identified vagal afferent fibers and different types of terminals in the mucosa, myenteric plexus, and external muscle layers of the stomach and duodenum. In the duodenal mucosa, neither a C-terminal (Ab-1) nor an N-terminal (Ab-2) specific antibody produced any specific staining; in the myenteric plexus, non-vagal enteric neurons and their processes, but not vagal intraganglionic laminar endings (IGLEs), exhibited CCKAR-immunoreactivity. Similarly, in the gastric myenteric plexus, a population of enteric neurons and their processes, but not identified vagal IGLEs, were labeled by both antibodies. In both external muscle layers of the stomach, CCKAR-immunoreactive axons were in close register with labeled vagal afferent intramuscular arrays, but the two labels were not contained in the same varicosities. Ab-1 immunoreactivity was found in the cell membrane of vagal afferent perikarya in the nodose ganglia and in pancreatic acinar cells. The failure to detect CCKAR-immunoreactivity in peripheral vagal afferent terminals cannot be due to methodological problems because it was present in enteric neurons in the same sections, and because it did not stain structures resembling IGLEs in material without the potentially masking vagal afferent label. We conclude that CCKA-receptors on vagal afferent terminals: 1) are below the immunohistochemical detection threshold, 2) exhibit a conformation or affinity state inaccessible to the two antibodies, or 3) are not transported to the peripheral terminals.