PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8460224

Spinal fixation. Part 1. Principles, basic hardware, and fixation techniques for the cervical spine.

Abstract

Spinal fixation devices provide stability and restore anatomic alignment in the treatment of fractures, degenerative disease, infection, and tumors and correct congenital deformities such as those seen in scoliosis. The devices provide immediate stability but are not strong enough to withstand prolonged stress and eventually fail, in most cases, if bone fusion does not occur. Bone graft material is often used to promote fusion and to replace bone after resection. Internal fixation is used to maintain position and alignment and to prevent motion as the spine fuses. Plates and rods are attached to the vertebral body or posterior elements with wire, screws, and hooks. Screws and wire can also be used alone as a means of fixation. Surgical techniques and instrumentation have advanced in recent years, and radiologists are exposed to a myriad of devices. They need to be able to identify the various plates, screws, wiring techniques, and grafts used most commonly and to understand their function in the cervical spine for fusions and treatment of fractures and degenerative disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Slone, M MacMillan, W J Montgomery. 1993. Spinal fixation. Part 1. Principles, basic hardware, and fixation techniques for the cervical spine.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.13.2.8460224

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis in Larsen syndrome: report of 3 cases and review of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To review the surgical results for midcervical kyphosis in 3 cases with Larsen syndrome, and to discuss the choice of surgical treatments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical kyphosis is the most hazardous and serious manifestation of Larsen syndrome due to the risk of life-threatening paralysis, and thus usually requires surgical treatment. However, little information has been reported concerning surgical treatments for this challenging condition. METHODS: Three patients with Larsen syndrome were surgically treated for midcervical kyphosis at our institution. RESULTS: An infant with mild cervical kyphosis was successfully treated with posterior arthrodesis using a halo immobilization, and anterior vertebral growth with a mature posterior fusion mass resulted in spontaneous correction of the kyphosis. In the remaining 2 infants with myelopathic symptoms due to severe and structural kyphosis, anterior decompression and fusion via a lateral approach followed by posterior fusion with segmental spinal instrumentation and halo immobilization resulted in improved neurologic symptoms and solid fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior spinal fusion is only indicated for patients with mild and flexible cervical kyphosis, and anterior decompression and circumferential arthrodesis is required for patients with severe kyphotic deformity, who usually develop myelopathic symptoms. Anterior surgery for such a small patient with severe kyphosis involves much higher risk of spinal cord injury during decompression maneuvers and difficulty in stabilization of the reconstructed cervical spine. Therefore, all patients with Larsen syndrome should be screened with radiographs at the first visit to detect cervical kyphosis early so that posterior alone fusion is possible.

Cervical Vertebrae↗