PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8469128

Short-term memory: a brief commentary.

Abstract

Over the years, a metatheoretical view of short-term memory has developed. This view, closely related to the "modal" model from the 1960s, is supported by an increasing base of neurophysiological data, and a wide variety of empirical findings. It treats short-term memory as (1) the temporary, above threshold, activation of neural structures (related in not-too-well-specified ways to various recency effects); (2) a work space for carrying out virtually all cognitive operations involved in human cognition; and (3) the source of capacity limitations, accounting for certain memory limitations and most attentional limitations. The main problem with this view is the fact that it encompasses virtually everything that we are concerned with in human cognition--a successful model would almost be a general model of cognition, something the field has not yet approached. This situation is not grounds for despair. Progress is being made on many fronts, notwithstanding the fact that the most successful models are focused on specific task domains. Recent advances include an increasing awareness of the necessity for detailed models of short-term retrieval, a theme reflected in a number of articles in the present collection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Shiffrin. 1993. Short-term memory: a brief commentary.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The hierarchic structure of fears.

Contemporary theories of fears (and phobias) suggest two kinds of etiologic factors; those common to all fears (factors influencing fear-proneness) and factors specific to particular fears (e.g. specific learning experiences). There also may be etiologic factors of intermediate specificity; factors common to some but not all fears. The present article describes this hierarchic model of fears, which proposes that fears (and phobias) arise from a hierarchy of causal factors, ranging from specific to general. The model is supported by factor-analytic studies of fear inventories and behavioural-genetic studies of twins. However, further research is needed to clarify the number of levels, and to identify environmental, psychobiological, and genetic factors at each level of the causal hierarchy. The hierarchic model of fears represents a call for research. It encourages researchers to take a broad view of etiology by considering factors at various levels of causal specificity.

Arousal

Event-related potentials can reveal differences between two decision-making groups.

Previous research has shown that a complex decision is dependent on an underlying utility metric that is used by decision making processes to accumulate preference for one alternative. This study postulated that a state of indecision may arise if this underlying metric is poorly organized. The underlying metric was examined with a paired comparison task while measuring event-related potentials (ERP) for subjects classified as 'career decided' and 'career undecided'. Stimuli for comparison were presented either sequentially or simultaneously. The simultaneous condition produced results consistent with the hypothesis that undecided subjects have a poorly organized value metric as revealed in both the behavioral data and the P3 component. A relationship between P3 amplitude and word distance on the underlying metric was found only for the decided group. This was interpreted in terms of the previously documented relationship between P3 and the constructs of decision confidence and task difficulty.

Arousal