PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8475469

[The Basel dependence study].

U von Bardeleben·D Ladewig·A Simon
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a survey of 177 patients of several outpatient departments and private practices in the area of Basel there were 23% with a dependence syndrome according to the diagnostic guidelines of ICD-10. Sedatives and hypnotics were the mostly mentioned psychotropic substances in this group. In a second survey six to twelve months later 80% of the initial study group were reassessed, focusing on referrals of the patients with a dependence syndrome to institutions specialized for the treatment of addiction. In most cases these patients were still treated at the previous institution; there were only a few referrals. Improvements concerning the increase of the referral rate to competent specialized institutions for patients with addiction seems possible by implementation of a decentralized consultation liaison service for outpatient departments, hospitals and also private practitioners in a mobile form.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlcoholismCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIllicit DrugsIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychotropic DrugsSubstance-Related DisordersSwitzerlandCase ReportsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U von Bardeleben, D Ladewig, A Simon. 1993. [The Basel dependence study].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8475469/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Stress and the biology of inequality.

It is well established that health depends on socioeconomic circumstances, but the biology of this relation is not well described. Psychosocial factors operating throughout the life course, beginning in early life, influence a variety of biological variables. Research with non-human primates shows the effects of dominance hierarchy on biology, and similar metabolic differentials are evident in a hierarchy of white collar civil servants. The neuroendocrine "fight or flight" response produces physiological and metabolic alterations which parallel those observed with lower socioeconomic status. The biological effects of the psychosocial environment could explain health inequalities between relatively affluent groups.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1997

Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance on informed consent to clinicians offering cancer susceptibility testing. PARTICIPANTS: The Task Force on Informed Consent is part of the Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium (CGSC), whose members were recipients of National Institutes of Health grants to assess the implications of cancer susceptibility testing. The 10 task force members represent a range of relevant backgrounds, including various medical specialties, social science, genetic counseling, and consumer advocacy. EVIDENCE: The CGSC held 3 public meetings from 1994 to 1996. At its first meeting, the task force jointly established a list of topics. The cochairs (G.G. and J.R.B) then developed an outline and assigned each topic to an appropriate writer and reviewer. Writers summarized the literature on their topics and drafted recommendations, which were then revised by the reviewers. The cochairs compiled and edited the entire manuscript. All members were involved in writing this report. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The first draft was distributed to task force members, after which a meeting was held to discuss its content and organization. Consensus was reached by voting. A subsequent draft was presented to the entire CGSC at its third meeting, and comments were incorporated. CONCLUSIONS: The task force recommends that informed consent for cancer susceptibility testing be an ongoing process of education and counseling in which (1) providers elicit participant, family, and community values and disclose their own, (2) decision making is shared, (3) the style of information disclosure is individualized, and (4) specific content areas are discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗