PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8475813

Titanium Riechert head ring for MR stereotaxy. Technical note.

C B Ostertag·L R Schad·R Koch·R Maier·B Wowra
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance has become the preferred neuro-imaging modality. To fully take advantage of the high anatomical resolution the Riechert stereotactic system was adapted for use in Magnetic Resonance Stereotaxy. The head ring which until recently was made of an aluminum alloy has been replaced by an unsegmented head ring of pure titanium without changing the dimensions and fixation mode. No significant misregistration due to eddy currents has been noticed. Minor distortion induced by the titanium head ring can be corrected mathematically. Thus the geometric information is limited only by the pixel resolution of the MR image.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsBrain MappingEquipment DesignHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, AnatomicRadiosurgeryStereotaxic TechniquesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C B Ostertag, L R Schad, R Koch, R Maier, B Wowra. 1993. Titanium Riechert head ring for MR stereotaxy. Technical note.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405188

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed1999

Correcting for artifacts in complex aqueous solutions when using the pH-sensitive dye 2',7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)- 5-(and -6)carboxyfluorescein.

The pH-sensitive fluorescent indicator dye 2', 7'-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and -6)carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) is routinely used to measure intracellular pH within cells. Surprisingly, no studies have been performed to see if various solution parameters modulate the fluorescence intensity of BCECF even though viscosity artifacts have been reported for particular Ca2+ selective dyes. In this report we demonstrate that even minor increases in the concentration of a number of different agents significantly decrease the excitation fluorescence intensity at two wavelengths routinely used to determine solution pH. Solution viscosity was varied using a number of different agents including glycerol, sucrose, polyethylene glycol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and methylcellulose. In general, there was a detectable and significant decrease in the maximum fluorescence excitation ratio as the viscosity was increased, although the effect was more dramatic with Newtonian solutions than with non-Newtonian solutions. This same general effect was seen at pH 6.5, 7.0, and 7.3, a range of pH levels where BCECF is found to be particularly sensitive. To correct for these artifactually low values we used different combinations of excitation wavelengths to determine which could be used to accurately measure pH while minimizing the artifact. Choosing excitation wavelengths so that excitation ratios were collected at 470 and 435 nm allowed a significant signal to quantitatively measure pH while the artifact was nearly abolished.

Artifacts↗
PubMed1999

Validation of a solid-phase microextraction method for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides in fruits and fruit juice.

A method for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides (diazinon, fenitrothion, fenthion, quinalphos, triazophos, phosalon and pyrazophos) in fruit (pears) and fruit juice samples was developed and validated. The samples were diluted with water, extracted by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and analysed by gas chromatography (GC) using a flame photometric detector in phosphorous mode. Limits of detection of the method for fruit and fruit juice matrices were below 2 micrograms/kg for all pesticides. Relative standard deviations for triplicate analyses of samples fortified at 25 micrograms/kg of each pesticide were not higher than 8.7%. Recovery tests were performed for concentrations between 25 and 250 micrograms/kg. Mean recoveries for each pesticide were all above 75.9% and below 102.6% for juice, and between 70 and 99% for fruit except for pyrazophos in the fruit sample (with mean recovery of 53%). Therefore, the proposed method is applicable in the analysis of pesticides in fruit matrices and the use of the method in routine analysis of pesticide residues is discussed.

Artifacts↗