PubMed · 8476649
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W N McDicken. 1993. Needle guidance techniques.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8476649/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration cytology has proved to be an accurate, cost-effective, and safe technique for diagnosing inflammatory and neoplastic lesions at different body sites. Its applicability in bone pathology, however, has been controversial due to a high percentage of inadequate samples and nonspecific results in the diagnosis of primary bone lesions. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of the technique and its capacity for diagnosing primary bone lesions were assessed. In addition, the authors analyzed the diagnostic limitations with focus on specimen adequacy. METHODS: The authors reviewed 314 consecutive fine-needle aspirations of bone from 308 patients. Direct or cytospin smears from aspirated material were fixed in 95% alcohol and stained by a modified Papanicolaou technique. Ninety-seven smears (31%) initially were considered unsatisfactory and excluded from the study. A diagnosis was rendered in 217 cases (69%), which were classified into 4 categories: primary bone lesions (benign and malignant) (42%), metastatic bone tumors (37%), suspicious for malignancy (5%), and negative (16%). RESULTS: The overall accuracy was 95%. Seventy-eight percent of primary bone lesions were correctly diagnosed by cytology. All cases diagnosed as metastatic by cytology were correct. The authors encountered difficulties diagnosing fibro-osseous lesions. Thirteen percent of cases were erroneously diagnosed as "negative" or "inflammatory conditions." On review, the absence of adequate cytologic material was noted in all of them. This sampling error could have been avoided by the presence of an on-site cytopathologist. CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle aspiration of bone is a simple, reliable, and accurate diagnostic technique that can facilitate patient management and preoperative decision-making and/or avoid unnecessary invasive procedures for patients with primary or metastatic bone lesions. However, the radiologist, cytopathologist, and orthopedic surgeon should work together for optimal results. Moreover, a definitive pathologic diagnosis should not be issued if diagnostic material is not adequate and/or clinicoradiologic information is incompatible.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to optimize the core shape of prostatic core needle biopsies using a novel preembedding method, and to investigate the influence of the number of cores per tissue block on the histologic yield per section level. METHODS: Twenty-four core needle biopsies were taken from a fresh prostatectomy specimen, using an 18-gauge needle. Twelve core needle biopsies were conventionally fixed floating free in formalin-filled containers, whereas 12 biopsies were stretched between two nylon meshes, and placed in tissue cassettes before fixation. The total number of tissue sections per paraffin block necessary for complete workup of the tissue was determined. Using image analysis, the relation of the area of every fifth section level was calculated in relation to the total projected area of the biopsies. Both methods of tissue processing were compared for both parameters. RESULTS: In contrast to the curved biopsies after conventional processing, the optimized preembedding method generally led to stretched cores after fixation and embedding. This method led to a 100% decrease in total number of tissue sections necessary for complete workup and to higher percentages of the tissue amount per section level compared to the total projected core area. These parameters were also influenced by the number of cores per paraffin block, but to a minor degree. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that optimized preembedding of prostatic needle biopsies improves the histologic yield per section level. The continuous occurrence of representative sections could improve diagnostic accuracy in the histological examination of prostatic core needle biopsies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.