PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8477063

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) enhances complement component C3 production by human monocytes/macrophages.

Abstract

The third complement component, C3, is an important factor in the host defense mechanism in which monocytes/macrophages participate as the primary phagocytes. Monocytes/macrophages are the principal extrahepatic producers of C3, and this C3 production is thought to be regulated by several cytokines. In the present study, we demonstrated that human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) enhanced C3 production by human peripheral monocytes in serum-free culture. Analytical immunoblot and ELISA showed that the presence of M-CSF increased the production of intracellular pro-C3 and extracellular C3 for 24 h in a dose-dependent manner. To confirm the rapid effect of M-CSF on C3 production, we performed metabolic labeling of C3 with [35S]methionine. The production of [35S]C3 for the first 6 h in the presence of M-CSF was also increased as compared to that in the absence of M-CSF. In addition to the previously reported effects of M-CSF on monocytes/macrophages, such as the enhancement of C3 receptor expression and C3 receptor-mediated phagocytosis, we consider that the effects of M-CSF demonstrated in this study are of importance in the local immune system organization of C3 and monocytes/macrophages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Andoh, Y Fujiyama, K Kitoh, M Niwakawa, K Hodohara, T Bamba, S Hosoda. 1993. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) enhances complement component C3 production by human monocytes/macrophages.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8477063/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A missense mutation in factor I (IF) predisposes to atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

A genetic predisposition involving complement regulatory genes has become evident in some patients with atypical HUS. In this paper, a patient with a heterozygous missense mutation in factor I (IF) is described. Although the serum level of IF was normal, a mild functional defect in the alternative pathway of complement could be demonstrated in the affected members of the family. After an episode of atypical HUS, chronic renal insufficiency started at the age of 15 months. Recurrence of HUS, with loss of the renal transplant, occurred twice in this patient. The recurrence of HUS in the graft was not reflected by haematological abnormalities (haemolysis, thrombocytopenia). One additional transplant was lost due to arterial thrombosis of the renal artery. This report confirms the gloomy outcome of renal transplants in patients with an IF deficiency. New therapies should be evaluated in these patients.

Complement C3↗

Consumption of erythrocyte CR1 (CD35) is associated with protection against systemic lupus erythematosus renal flare.

Erythrocyte complement receptor type one (E-CR1) is thought to protect against immune complex (IC) disease through interactions that lead to E-CR1 consumption, and low E-CR1 levels are characteristic of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that E-CR1 consumption can predict or mark SLE flare. Recurrently active SLE patients [n = 43; 28 with past or present major renal manifestations (SLER) and 15 without (SLENR)], were evaluated every 2 months by detailed protocol testing (mean follow-up 22 months), including direct measurements of E-CR1 levels using a radioimmunoassay. In all patients, detectable E-CR1 levels fluctuated widely through acute periods of consumption and regeneration, preventing the use of any single value as a baseline. However, when individual chronic baseline values were used, determined as the mean of all E-CR1 values 4 months or more from a flare, a clear trend was observed. In 16 of 16 instances of non-renal flare in SLER patients, E-CR1 levels decreased at flare (mean decrease 34%, P < 0.0001). In contrast, no consistent difference was observed for flare in SLENR patients or for renal flare in SLER patients. Changes in E-CR1 levels did not correlate with plasma CR1 levels. In conclusion, single occurrences of E-CR1 consumption did not generally predict or mark SLE flare. However, compared to the average E-CR1 levels measured during no-flare intervals, E-CR1 consumption in SLER patients at flare was strongly associated with freedom from signs of renal involvement. We postulate that E-CR1 consumption reflects E-CR1 function that includes protecting against SLE nephritis.

Complement C3↗